Skip to main content

Too Much Stuff

"Why is it so hard to resist new things even when we know we already have too much. Can we find an alternative to the more, more, more mentality?"

That promo got me hooked into the half-hour doco "Too Much Stuff". Australian viewers can see it online. Otherwise, here are some of my highlights.


Host Sarah Wilson sums up the problem right at the start. "At every turn we're urged to possess the next thing that will make us feel smarter and more desirable. Anything we want is available with just one click. We're filling up our lives with stuff; yet ultimately, many of us feel empty, guilty and stressed out by our consumption."

She sets out to explore an alternative. To see if "radically reducing our consumption" can lead to a better life. (Spoiler alert: Yes)

Sarah says many people call her a minimalist but she's not so much about getting rid of things, more about not buying stuff.

What's wrong with the Marie Kondo approach?

Each episode of Marie Kondo's hit show ends up with "mountains of stuff destined to be chucked out". Sarah wonders if it's just clearing space to buy more stuff.

Each year charities do a good job diverting goods from landfill. But we throw out 15 tonnes of clothes every 10 minutes. (I think those are Australian figures) 

We're referred to as consumers. Technically, consume means to devour, waste or destroy. Australians are "epic consumers". If the whole world behaved like us, we'd need 4.5 earths. That's how much we devour, waste or destroy.

Psychologist Mary Hoang featured throughout the documentary. She says that "decluttering can be a form of cognitive dissonance". We want to be appear to be doing a good thing. But rather than look for a sustainable solution, we just get rid of the evidence.

2020

So how did 2020 change all that? Mary reckons people's values started to shift, but that we're still grappling with "realigning and reorienting ourselves to what really matters". We started to buy less, value people more, and have simpler lives (some even moved out of the cities). But then we felt pressure and went "back to old habits".

She reckons there's a "real undercurrent of people wanting change and not wanting to go all the way back to where they were before" but it's just that change is really difficult for people.

Kathy & Matt

Kathy and Matt used to work 16 hours days They earnt a lot, but also spent a lot on things they didn't need.

The illness of Kathy's mum was the wake-up call. They switched to living in a tiny home on her parents' property in the country.

Kathy says many of her friends are jealous, but they're scared - or think they can't do it.

What we really really want

Mary Hoang quotes a survey where people are asked if they are lonely. At least 1 in 4 say "sometimes" and half of people say "a lot". Mary says we need to connect with each other.

"Shopping and consuming will never fulfill the need we have. We have basic human needs of connection and safety. A product can't do that for us. We need to understand that, and stop looking in the wrong places."

Sarah puts it a different way. "Rationally, we own more that enough material stuff. And yet we are duped into believing that more and more material things will bring us love, connection, belonging - perhaps identity and status. When it doesn't, we buy even more stuff."

One solution

Sarah spend some of the documentary talking to people in the Buy Nothing project. In short, instead of decluttering into landfill, people give items freely to their neighbours through an online group. It replaces both waste and consumerism with local human-to-human interaction.

As one local organiser says, "Making sure a toaster doesn't end up in landfill .. doesn't solve the problem. But changing how we spend our money does."

Being free

In summing up, Sarah says that minimalism is not just about having less stuff. "It's also about not just filling your diary or home because there's space. It's being free to find out what you truly connect to. When we engage in this kind of action it reduces the overwhelm that stops us from living the life we truly want.

When we consume less we live more."

Related reading

Documentary: Less in Now

Why living differently is rare

Purchase distancing

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to waste a year's wages

A friend recently asked me why it is that so many people (on good incomes) are struggling to save. Often the big three money areas are housing, transport and food. In one sense these are necessary items. But what we spend on them is often way more than necessary. I crunched some numbers on how much extra my wife and I could spend on these things - if for some reason we wanted to burn our money. 1. Housing Our apartment is fairly nice, but also cost-effective. I've mentioned how choosing it saves us $1,800 per year , compared to a similar one we saw. The high end of 2-bedroom apartments in our suburb is $305 per week more than our apartment. Not $305 per week. $305 per week more than ours is. I cannot get over that. Sure it's new and modern-looking, but that's a lot of money. It's an extra $15,860 per year above what we pay. 2. Transport The Australian Automobile Association lists the costs of owning and running a car. It includes many often-overlooked c

Don't dump on charities

Netflix causes mass dumping. Here's an alternative. January is usually a big month for physical donations to charity. In 2019 it's been over-the-top (literally) as charity donation bins have been overflowing with items. The Netflix series "Tidying Up" by famous declutterer Marie Kondo (see her book ) has inspired many to declutter their homes. But in the process they've cluttered the streets. What's so bad about donating? When the bins overflow the extra items are thrown away. Having been in the weather, the rain and on the ground, they are classified as contaminated and cannot be sold. To make it worse, much of what fills the bins is not good enough to sell, and is also dumped. Bad donations hurt charities 13 million dollars. That's how much it costs charities to deal with all the junk we dump on them - 60,000 tonnes a year. Lifeline says half its stores have stopped accepting donations. We might think we're helping, but that's a lot

This could all be yours

This cartoon kind of happened to me on the weekend. Joking about death My dad has his own unique sense of humour. Flippantly he joked that when he passes away, the first thing I'll need to do is get a rubbish skip (maybe two) and jam it full with all the junk from the garage. I was reminded of Marie Kondo, who says in her book that we have to deal with items either now or later; so it might as well be now. For people who have retired, I guess there's a third option: Ignore it for a few more decades and let descendants deal with it. Don't get me wrong - my dad has plenty of years left yet. But from his joke I'm guessing he's reasonably happy to let it all sit there while he enjoys retired life. Why not deal with it? I can kind of understand. It's an overwhelming task (even to look at). There's also the "I might need that" factor. Which is fair enough, but even if an item is needed, is it findable in amongst everything else? About half the