Skip to main content

Why millionaires don't "feel" rich

We're wealthier than ever - so why don't we feel like it?

Australia has gone almost three decades without recession. The stock market recently hit a record high. Our wages are record highs. Home loan rates are at record lows. We live in one of the richest countries in the world at the richest point in history. So what's wrong?

Comparison

Wealth is relative. So what do we compare to?

Where we expect to be?

"When your wages growth is only 2 or 3 per cent, you don't feel as well-off as when it's going up 10 per cent. That's that nominal distortion that people often suffer from", says economist Shane Oliver, and that "expectations have grown a lot faster than reality."

We're earning more than last year, but we want even more. So compared to our imaginary situation, we see ourselves as worse off.

What we see around us?

Shane Oliver again. "If you think about it - Australians today are a lot wealthier. They're living far richer and longer lives than their parents did but they don't recognise that. They judge everything by what they see around them and if ... someone has got two cars and you've only got one, you feel worse off.

These observations were part of a report on ABC's 7.30. Two households were interviewed and their stories were classic examples of these two harmful comparisons.


Slumming it in a private school

The Lobasso family have four children, a very nice home, the luxury of being able to choose for one parent to stay at home, and send all their kids to a private (Catholic) school. To most people that would sound fairly privileged but they still consider themselves to be struggling.

To me this is pure expectation. Two-thirds of Australian kids go to government schools, but this family seems to have the built-in expectation that their kids need something more expensive.

They said they started the kids in an independent private school, but couldn't "justify that expense". It's a bit like complaining about having to downgrade from a Porsche to an Audi because times are tough.

We don't feel like millionaires

The average Australian household is now worth a million dollars but self-funded retirees Anne and Tim Sandler don't feel like millionaires because they "perceive wealth as people who can basically do what they want to do when they want to do it".

In reality only 28% of retirees are rich enough to be self-funded. The rest rely on a full or part-pension. The Sandlers are wealthier than at least 72% of their fellow retirees - most likely even more. At worst they're in the richest 28% of retirees, but don't consider themselves wealthy.

Sometimes it seems that whatever amount of money we have, we think we need even more money. More on that another time.

Interest rates

Earlier I mentioned Australia's record low interest rates. Supposedly they help people pay off their homes quicker, but in a get-more culture they just lure us into getting bigger and bigger houses and spending more money (often borrowed) for things we don't need and don't make us happy.

Shane Oliver says "We get the instant impact ... that boost to our happiness when we get the gadget home. We've got it but then we're left with the debt and have got to pay it off and that sort of drags our happiness back down again".

I'll write more about possessions and happiness in an upcoming article but today my point is that the endless pursuit of more stuff makes it harder to have enough money to feel comfortable.

I also wonder if friends and family of the Lobasso family see the size of their home and their enormous TV, assume they are wealthier than they are and suggest they send their kids to a private school. Many of our decisions are made to keep up with social expectations and the appearance of wealth simply raises those expectations.

So what can we do

Sometimes a different comparison can be helpful. Global Rich List can give you a sense of where you rank in the world. That's quite a mind-adjustment.

Also we can try to extract ourselves from the more-more-more culture. The Lobasso parents recognise this. Kathrine says "I don't really care if people are driving around in BMWs at 17-years-old. I think the most important thing for our children is that we raise them in a healthy way". Tony says that wealth is the family unit and spending time together.

Hopefully they can put those thoughts into practice. It can be tough in a consumerist culture - but culture is just the total of our individual attitudes. We can turn it around.

There's a lot of truth in the old saying "The richest person is not the one who has the most, but the one who needs the least".

Comments

  1. Thank you for this article. I live in the United States (born and raised!) so it is refreshing to read that this struggle with ^more^ is not just a US concern. I consider myself to be a 'simplifist' - I am simplifying a lot of aspects of my life so that I can enjoy time and people more. I am striving to minimize my possessions and footprint on the planet to maximize my time and money to have a joyous, simple life.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Lei. Thanks for your comment. From your description of yourself it sounds like this blog might be exactly the thing for you. :) Yes the struggle is definitely more widespread than just the US. I even read a few years ago that Australia claimed the dubious honour of having the biggest houses in the world (previously it was held by the US).
    Hope you continue to read my blog and look forward to reading more of your comments :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Love the Global Rich List. Certainly a good reminder.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes we often compare ourselves to those around us (who are also getting quite wealthy). A better perspective allows us to be more grateful for all we have. :)

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to waste a year's wages

A friend recently asked me why it is that so many people (on good incomes) are struggling to save. Often the big three money areas are housing, transport and food. In one sense these are necessary items. But what we spend on them is often way more than necessary. I crunched some numbers on how much extra my wife and I could spend on these things - if for some reason we wanted to burn our money. 1. Housing Our apartment is fairly nice, but also cost-effective. I've mentioned how choosing it saves us $1,800 per year , compared to a similar one we saw. The high end of 2-bedroom apartments in our suburb is $305 per week more than our apartment. Not $305 per week. $305 per week more than ours is. I cannot get over that. Sure it's new and modern-looking, but that's a lot of money. It's an extra $15,860 per year above what we pay. 2. Transport The Australian Automobile Association lists the costs of owning and running a car. It includes many often-overlooked c

Don't dump on charities

Netflix causes mass dumping. Here's an alternative. January is usually a big month for physical donations to charity. In 2019 it's been over-the-top (literally) as charity donation bins have been overflowing with items. The Netflix series "Tidying Up" by famous declutterer Marie Kondo (see her book ) has inspired many to declutter their homes. But in the process they've cluttered the streets. What's so bad about donating? When the bins overflow the extra items are thrown away. Having been in the weather, the rain and on the ground, they are classified as contaminated and cannot be sold. To make it worse, much of what fills the bins is not good enough to sell, and is also dumped. Bad donations hurt charities 13 million dollars. That's how much it costs charities to deal with all the junk we dump on them - 60,000 tonnes a year. Lifeline says half its stores have stopped accepting donations. We might think we're helping, but that's a lot

This could all be yours

This cartoon kind of happened to me on the weekend. Joking about death My dad has his own unique sense of humour. Flippantly he joked that when he passes away, the first thing I'll need to do is get a rubbish skip (maybe two) and jam it full with all the junk from the garage. I was reminded of Marie Kondo, who says in her book that we have to deal with items either now or later; so it might as well be now. For people who have retired, I guess there's a third option: Ignore it for a few more decades and let descendants deal with it. Don't get me wrong - my dad has plenty of years left yet. But from his joke I'm guessing he's reasonably happy to let it all sit there while he enjoys retired life. Why not deal with it? I can kind of understand. It's an overwhelming task (even to look at). There's also the "I might need that" factor. Which is fair enough, but even if an item is needed, is it findable in amongst everything else? About half the