Skip to main content

Why we're not happy with things

I've learnt some surprising and shocking things in this Yale University course on The Science of Wellbeing.

The professor gave the class the warning "Everything you thought was important for being happy is not".

Miswanting

We want the wrong things. Typically people think happiness comes from a good job, money, cool stuff, good grades, good looks etc. A range of studies show the effect of these things on our well-being to be either negligible, non-existent or even negative.

It reminds me of that quote "People may spend their whole lives climbing the ladder of success only to find, once they reach the top, that the ladder is leaning against the wrong wall".

4 ways our thoughts trick us

Our intuitions are often wrong - much like the way our eyes are tricked by optical illusions. Even if we know the trick, our eyes still get tricked by the illusion.

We judge things in relative terms rather than absolute. Bizarrely, many people would prefer a lower pay (if higher than their coworkers' pay) rather than a higher pay (if their coworkers received even more). It's a bit like this optical illusion where we see the orange circles differently because of the other circles around them. Even though they are the same.


We get used to stuff. New things quickly become just normal. Even if our salary increases each year, happiness doesn't - because we get used to the new salary. Even lottery winners, one year later, are about as happy as everyone else.

We don't realise that we'll get used to stuff. We think that the shiny new object (phone, car, house) will make us very happy for a very long time. Very quickly they go from "new car" to "car", from "amazing new house" to "home", from "new model phone" to "phone" to "this old piece of junk".

So what does cause happiness?

Our level of happiness is a combination of three things.

About 50% is our genetic 'set point' - we were born that way. 10% is life circumstances - the stuff that happens to us. The other 40% is our own thoughts and actions.

The 40% is the most interesting to me. It's a large section and it's within our control. So there are things we can do to be significantly happier. But they might be different things from the things we thought.

I'll get into that in part 2.

PS. Also, I highly recommend the course. It's free and potentially life-changing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Adam ruins work

The TV show Adam Ruins Everything took a look at the workplace - and the 40 hour work week. It confirms my thoughts that the 40-hour work week (or at least it's relevance today) is a figment of our imagination. Very enlightening. Watch it now . The first 7 minutes are the most relevant. There were some astonishing stats coming out of it. For example, we spend only 45% of the work week doing our actual job (not including meetings etc). That's about 18 hours per week. Interestingly, that's what experts predicted. With rises in productivity, the 1950s brought talk of a 4-day work week. By 2030 they reckoned we might work just 15 hours per week. But instead we work longer hours. That results in more mistakes and safety mishaps. It also reduces brain function. We might think that it's being productive but Adam points to countries that have as much prosperity as America while working much shorter hours. A classic case of 'less is more'. PS. for the basis of ...

My mug shot

This is every mug I own. How many did I buy? Zero. They seem to just appear. I don't even drink tea or coffee. In winter I have might have a hot chocolate or cocoa. So 9 mugs seems like a lot. How does this happen? I reckon most mugs are gifts. There are two reasons for this. 1. It's a safe bet. People need to drink. It's kind of like buying your dad socks for father's day. But the difference is that socks wear out and need replacing. Cups don't. One of these mugs i received as a kid in the 90s. It still works fine. Now it has 8 friends. 2. It's often for what's on the mug. It might be a greeting card-style message, or a sports team logo, or something humorous. It's a good thing that something functional can also provide an inspiring message or pleasant memory as you use it. But the problem comes when we have too much. If I use the cup my sister gave me at Christmas, then I'm not using the 'awesome brother' one she already gave m...

Investing Less, Earning More

Could investing $13,000 be better than investing $70,000? In this case, the answer seems to be yes. In Making Money Made Simple , Noel Whittaker compares two hypothetical investors: Person 1: Invests $ 1,000 a year from age 18-30. Person 2: Invests $ 2,000 a year from age 30-65. You might think that person 2 would be better off, but here's how it goes (in chart form): Person 1 stops investing at 30, but their investment keeps growing. At that point, person 1's yearly growth is more than person 2's yearly contribution. That's why person 2 never catches up. Person 1 ends up about $ 150,000 ahead, despite investing about one-fifth of what the person 2 invested. What if growth isn't so good? These calculations assume 10% growth. What if it isn't that high? Fair point. I've run the numbers at lower rates of growth. At 9%, person 1 is still better off. At 8% it's close, and person 2 comes out slightly ahead. But that's not really the poin...