How to boost your pension by 50%

People in the superannuation industry will say you need millions to retire. But it doesn't have to be that way.

The Barefoot method

If you've got millions in retirement good for you. But if not there's another way as outlined in book the Barefoot Investor. It's quite an effective strategy especially for those of who have had low income, variable income, or who are retiring early.

The idea is, by 67, to get your superannuation balance close to the maximum you can have before it starts reducing your pension.

Assuming you don't have other significant investments, at this point you can get the full age pension, plus some handy superannuation income. (Barefoot Investor also suggests some very-part-time work to boost it even more.)

How much are we talking?

Depending on your situation, you could get 50% more than the age pension.

For instance (as of June 2020) a single homeowner gets $22,375 age pension. At 67 a super balance of $225,000 would provide additional income of $11,250.

Likewise a couple who don't own a home get a $33,732 age pension. At 67 a super balance of $400,000 would provide additional income of $20,000.

As far as I understand it, all of this is tax-free (but I'm not a tax expert).

Edit

This is the part of the post where I previously had a calculator. The idea was that you could work out if this could be a possibility for you.

Realistically I'm not going to be able to update it each year as the government thresholds change, so I've removed the calculator.

Also, most people who tried it found out they would be way over the threshold. This should be great news (having lots of money in retirement). But some felt disappointment that they couldn't get the boost. Even though their retirement scenario would be far better than someone who could benefit.

For all these reasons, I've removed the calculator link. If you want to know more I recommend borrowing the Barefoot Investor book from the library.

Big disclaimer

This is a summary of something I read in the Barefoot Investor book, accompanied by some maths. It is not financial advice, and does not take into account your individual situation. Please evaluate you own circumstances and seek your own financial advice.

Comments

How to waste a year's wages

A friend recently asked me why it is that so many people (on good incomes) are struggling to save. Often the big three money areas are housing, transport and food. In one sense these are necessary items. But what we spend on them is often way more than necessary. I crunched some numbers on how much extra my wife and I could spend on these things - if for some reason we wanted to burn our money. 1. Housing Our apartment is fairly nice, but also cost-effective. I've mentioned how choosing it saves us $1,800 per year , compared to a similar one we saw. The high end of 2-bedroom apartments in our suburb is $305 per week more than our apartment. Not $305 per week. $305 per week more than ours is. I cannot get over that. Sure it's new and modern-looking, but that's a lot of money. It's an extra $15,860 per year above what we pay. 2. Transport The Australian Automobile Association lists the costs of owning and running a car. It includes many often-overlooked c

Don't dump on charities

Netflix causes mass dumping. Here's an alternative. January is usually a big month for physical donations to charity. In 2019 it's been over-the-top (literally) as charity donation bins have been overflowing with items. The Netflix series "Tidying Up" by famous declutterer Marie Kondo (see her book ) has inspired many to declutter their homes. But in the process they've cluttered the streets. What's so bad about donating? When the bins overflow the extra items are thrown away. Having been in the weather, the rain and on the ground, they are classified as contaminated and cannot be sold. To make it worse, much of what fills the bins is not good enough to sell, and is also dumped. Bad donations hurt charities 13 million dollars. That's how much it costs charities to deal with all the junk we dump on them - 60,000 tonnes a year. Lifeline says half its stores have stopped accepting donations. We might think we're helping, but that's a lot

This could all be yours

This cartoon kind of happened to me on the weekend. Joking about death My dad has his own unique sense of humour. Flippantly he joked that when he passes away, the first thing I'll need to do is get a rubbish skip (maybe two) and jam it full with all the junk from the garage. I was reminded of Marie Kondo, who says in her book that we have to deal with items either now or later; so it might as well be now. For people who have retired, I guess there's a third option: Ignore it for a few more decades and let descendants deal with it. Don't get me wrong - my dad has plenty of years left yet. But from his joke I'm guessing he's reasonably happy to let it all sit there while he enjoys retired life. Why not deal with it? I can kind of understand. It's an overwhelming task (even to look at). There's also the "I might need that" factor. Which is fair enough, but even if an item is needed, is it findable in amongst everything else? About half the

But wait... there's less!

Search This Blog