Skip to main content

The $1000 project

Some books provide a wealth of advice. The $1000 project has basically one idea - but it's good.


Why don't we have more money?

It's not like we don't earn money. At the average Australian salary of $75k, we'd earn a million dollars by 35. According to author (and financial advisor) Canna Campbell, people who find this out wonder "where has all my money gone?".

Well, it's not about salary. It's what you do with it.

Pretend savings

So often we 'save' money - a bargain at the grocery store, taking a packed lunch to work, or getting a lower rate on our mortgage. Other times we get a bit of extra money - some over-time at work, a tax refund, selling something online.

So where does all this money go? Often we spend it on something else. "I saved $50 on X, so I can afford to blow $50 on Y" is often the way we rationalise it. Clearly that's no actual saving at all.

What's the answer?

Step 1 - Canna sets up an extra bank account and calls it the "$1000 Project".

Step 2 - Every time she saves money she transfers the same amount to that account. Same for any extra money that comes her way.

Step 3 - When she hits $1000 in the account, she invests in shares. (Then repeats steps 2 and 3)

Is it for everyone?

There's maths and there's psychology. In maths terms, yes buying shares in small increments rather than in bigger chunks might cost her more in fees.

The power of her approach is in the incentive to save (or earn) extra money. The $1000 goal is small enough to be achievable in the short term. There's great motivation to spend less and save more when the target is within reach.

Want more?

While the strategy is the core of the book, there's also a chapter of ideas for earning extra money, a chapter of ideas for saving, and a chapter introducing the idea of shares - if it's new for you.

Why not invest in property?

As a financial consultant she sees a lot of people looking to buy a home. When asked why, they say things like "it's time" or "I should". She says it's not important to them - just to society.

Her advice is to work out what fulfils you. If you really want it, then it's easier to save for it.

What did the project teach her?

Before the book, Canna did this project for a year and reached $1000 many times. Along the way she discovered:
  • saying no to some expensive activities brings relief
  • a bit of organisation and preparation can save a lot of "outsourcing"
  • saving money is not a deprivation but taking care of your future self
  • the value of simple things, relationships, connections and creating memories
  • the power of small conscious actions to make a big difference

You can see my other book reviews, or subscribe to receive future ones.

Comments

  1. Mindful Money, her latest book is great and delves more into other areas. I obtained it from loaning from local library after I had a hold on it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Illuminus. Thanks for that recommendation. A couple of people have mentioned that book to me since I posted this review. I've also added it to my borrow-from-the-library list. :)

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to waste a year's wages

A friend recently asked me why it is that so many people (on good incomes) are struggling to save. Often the big three money areas are housing, transport and food. In one sense these are necessary items. But what we spend on them is often way more than necessary. I crunched some numbers on how much extra my wife and I could spend on these things - if for some reason we wanted to burn our money. 1. Housing Our apartment is fairly nice, but also cost-effective. I've mentioned how choosing it saves us $1,800 per year , compared to a similar one we saw. The high end of 2-bedroom apartments in our suburb is $305 per week more than our apartment. Not $305 per week. $305 per week more than ours is. I cannot get over that. Sure it's new and modern-looking, but that's a lot of money. It's an extra $15,860 per year above what we pay. 2. Transport The Australian Automobile Association lists the costs of owning and running a car. It includes many often-overlooked c

The Transformer Table

Our new table transforms itself, and our view of furniture Here is our new table It has 3 modes. Friends mode: Seating up to 6 for dinner or board games. Couple mode: Great for the two of us. Or for doing some writing while looking out at the view. 99% mode: Most of the time we don't need a table, so it folds away. Storage in the side drawers. Best of all it allows the space to be multipurpose. Ordinarily a traffic area (between the kitchen, other rooms and the balcony) it can also be a spacious area for the two of us, a table for 6, or an expanded lounge area if we push the lounge furniture back. How it transforms homes Traditionally each room has one purpose. TV room for TV; bedroom for bed; study for studying; the dining room for the dining table. When furniture is cleverly designed , spaces can be multifunctional and we don't need so many rooms. It's one of the key concepts behind tiny homes . One of the architects from The Tiny House Company showed

This could all be yours

This cartoon kind of happened to me on the weekend. Joking about death My dad has his own unique sense of humour. Flippantly he joked that when he passes away, the first thing I'll need to do is get a rubbish skip (maybe two) and jam it full with all the junk from the garage. I was reminded of Marie Kondo, who says in her book that we have to deal with items either now or later; so it might as well be now. For people who have retired, I guess there's a third option: Ignore it for a few more decades and let descendants deal with it. Don't get me wrong - my dad has plenty of years left yet. But from his joke I'm guessing he's reasonably happy to let it all sit there while he enjoys retired life. Why not deal with it? I can kind of understand. It's an overwhelming task (even to look at). There's also the "I might need that" factor. Which is fair enough, but even if an item is needed, is it findable in amongst everything else? About half the