Skip to main content

The movie "In Time"

For a sci-fi movie set in 2169, "In Time" is remarkably similar to the choices we face today.



The premise

Future humans are genetically engineered to stop physically aging at 25. Then their life-clock (built into their forearm) starts counting down from 1 year. They'll die at 26 unless they add more time to their clock. As Will Salas (Justin Timberlake) describes it,
Time is now the currency. We earn it. We spend it.

While the wealthy have all the time they need, Will lives in the ghetto, where people "just want to wake up with more time than there are hours in the day" because when the clock reaches zero, that's it.

Spending Time

Characters earn extra time by getting paid or by passing it between people. They lose time as their clock ticks down or when they buy things.

So is a purchase worth the time lost? With less than a day on their life-clock is it worth giving up 4 minutes of life to pay for a coffee? Is it worth losing years of life to have a car?

Equally they have to be aware that time is constantly ticking away. Will tells his friends he doesn't "have time to gamble" (anymore). Though he used to win, the winnings don't make up for the time lost in the game.

Henry Hamilton

Henry has over 100 years on his clock. He laments to Will that "there are men with a million years while most live day to day". Realising there's more than enough for everyone, he wants to give away his time.

His question to Will, "If you had as much time as I had, what would you do with it?" is important. Will's answer impresses him and he leaves Will with a century.

"What would you do with it?"

Will gives 10 years to his friend Borel. We later find out that Borel used it to drink himself to death. Borel's wife understandably berates Will for giving him so much time.

It's one things to have the time to spend. It's another to spend it wisely.
(Sidenote: In the real life virus shutdown, many of us have more time on our hands, and alcohol sales have gone up 30%.)

Time zone travel

At one point Will travels from the ghetto to one of the wealthier areas. To cross the border he has to give up a whole year. In the movie this seemed an outrageous cost to be in a nicer area. But then I think of today's property prices. To buy into a 'prestigious' area could easily cost a year's salary or more.

Back to reality

So much of this applies to real life. In theory we pay for things with money, but that money often comes from giving up hours, days or years of our life to work.

Even our daily coffees or takeaway meals can add up to a 6-figure sum. That's a lot of free time wiped off our clock (and transferred to our employer's clock).

Our savings and investments are the opposite. As they grow, we're adding extra years of free time into our lives. A day's wage saved today could grow into a week. A week into a month, a couple of months into a year.

As in the movie, the system does favour the already wealthy. However, most of us have the opportunity to make wiser decisions and become more time-rich. Whether or not we do so is up to us.

Related reading

My day planner for extra home-time during 2020.
Work Optional - this book looks at getting to the point of not having to work, and what to do when you get there.
Time and How to Spend It - how to better spend our time to enjoy it more.
How to waste a year's wages - Do the opposite of this, but it shows how easy it is for a year's effort to slip through our fingers.
More articles about spending

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Simple phone

I get my fair share of teasing for still using a Nokia phone. So I feel quite vindicated that someone has now invented a new non-smartphone . It's pitched for those who want a decluttered life. Instead of features, its selling points are things like "reclaim a little quietude from the constant intrusions of technology", "no internet connection, no app store and definitely no camera for taking selfies". One quote from the article said "as smartphones get bigger and bulkier, there is a place for something small and simplified, without all the functions." That kind of statement resonates with me. Not just for phones, but for so many areas of life - including the houses we live in.

Why own a car, when you can go get?

That's the slogan of one company providing an alternative to car ownership. Here's our experience with them. Why not just have our own car? Another time I'll write a full post about that, but suffice to say that car ownership is a pain in the neck. The servicing, the maintenance, the repairs, the parking, the traffic, the registration, the insurance, the cleaning... For my wife and I, about 98% of our transport needs can be done on foot, by bike, by train, bus or ferry. Maybe 99% if you include rideshare. So we choose to avoid the pain (and cost) of car ownership. However, car use (I think of it separately from car ownership) can be handy in certain situations. We had one of those situations last weekend. Here's how it went. Booking a car My wife signed up for GoGet , and booked the car online for the time window she needed it. As a first-timer, she received her little membership card in the mail. On the day of the booking, GoGet sent her a reminder email about 20 minut...

Too Much Stuff

"Why is it so hard to resist new things even when we know we already have too much. Can we find an alternative to the more, more, more mentality?" That promo got me hooked into the half-hour doco "Too Much Stuff". Australian viewers can see it online . Otherwise, here are some of my highlights. Host Sarah Wilson sums up the problem right at the start. "At every turn we're urged to possess the next thing that will make us feel smarter and more desirable. Anything we want is available with just one click. We're filling up our lives with stuff; yet ultimately, many of us feel empty, guilty and stressed out by our consumption." She sets out to explore an alternative. To see if "radically reducing our consumption" can lead to a better life. (Spoiler alert: Yes) Sarah says many people call her a minimalist but she's not so much about getting rid of things, more about not buying stuff. What's wrong with the Marie Kondo approach? Each ep...