Skip to main content

$200k for a coffee and sandwich?

I'm reading "Playing with FIRE" by Scott Rieckens. He realised he could save a 6-figure amount just by not having a sandwich and coffee on his way to work each day.


Traditionally Scott would buy an coffee and a sandwich on his way to work. It was "only" eight dollars so it seemed like an easy purchase.

Even with free coffee at work, eight dollars seemed a small price to pay with a sandwich included.

Doing the Math

Then Scott crunched the numbers. Eight dollars each workday came to $160 a month. $1,920 per year.

Continuing this habit for 30 years of work would cost him $57,600.

If he invested that $160/month instead, he would accumulate $133,161 (invested at 5%).

Translating that into Australian dollars it's $194,765.27 (to be precise).

How the little things add up

It is amazing how even little things add up if we do them a lot. $8 doesn't sound much - until he realises he's buying 7,200 coffees and 7,200 sandwiches.

Are we getting value?

This is not to say don't ever buy anything. It's about working out whether we're really getting value from our purchases.

Repeat purchases are particularly in question - for two reasons. Because we do them often, the cost really adds up (like the coffees). We also know that the longer we have something the less we enjoy it.

So how much does stuff really cost?

Good question. I developed my own little calculator for this (grab a copy).

I tried an example of a $14 lunch each workday. It came out to cost nearly quarter of a million dollars.


Download your own copy and you can try it out for different expenses, whether they occur each workday, every day, week, month or year.

I'm not picking on coffee drinkers. It might be buying clothes you don't wear, having a gym membership you never use, or cable TV that you don't need.

By finding out the true cost you can decide whether it's providing good value, or whether you'd be better off with the cash.

Further reading

See my review of Scott's book Playing with FIRE, or his movie of the same name.

For future articles why not subscribe to my monthly-ish email. It's quick way to catch up on my new articles. Get it automatically when you get the calculator, or subscribe here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

5 Reasons why we hoard - and they're wrong

"Less is More" is one of the catch-cries of downsizing. Often the fewer things we have the more we value them. So it's a great title for a book that's basically a manual for how to de-clutter your home. The introductory chapter of Less is More: How to De-clutter Your Life gives some great insights into why we find it so hard to reduce our stuff. Here are 5 of them - the last one is one of the biggest for me. 1. The cost of holding on. We were raised by our parents and grandparents and in their day items were expensive and space was cheap. It made sense in those days to hold onto stuff just in case you ever needed it. But today housing is expensive and items are cheap. It's hard to change a habit, but now we save much more by downsizing. 2. Keeping it in the family. For some reason we prefer to give things to those close to us. Again this was viable in the days of big families and lots of children to receive hand-me-downs. But these days we have smaller fa...

20 unplugged ideas

May 1-7 is Screen-Free Week . It's about spending time away from the screen and more time with each other - or doing things we love. It's a great chance to break the work-tired-watchTV-ads-shop-work cycle. This list of twenty alternative ideas is great for screen-free week. It's also a great reminder of things we could enjoy if we're shopping and spending less - and maybe working less and enjoying life more.

Will robots take your job?

The future could be very different. It's one reason I started this blog. What will technology mean for jobs? For incomes? For society? So I was excited to find Will Robots Take Your Job? at my local library. What does the book say? There's always been technological change and we've always found jobs. As the more laborious jobs were taken by machines, we took on higher skilled jobs, moving further up the "skill ladder". The main question is whether this time is different. Will the "skill ladder" continue to have higher rungs for humans to move on to? Will these rungs appear as quickly as the current rungs disappear? Either way we're headed for significant disruption. Either large-scale re-training of our workforce or massive unemployment. The author despairs that our leaders seem not to talk about this - and worse still, not have a plan for it. Farmers or horses? In 1870 about 75% of Americans worked in agriculture and used 25 million hors...