Skip to main content

Where is the best place to live?

Where we live determines a lot about our life. 

So today I'm going to share a resource that can help you decide where might be a good place to live. 

It started with an article ranking Brisbane suburbs from 1 to 260.

That ranking was based on a set of 17 factors. Here are some of them.


But all 17 may not be relevant for you. And some might matter more than others.

So they developed a tool where you can rank the 5 factors most important to you and it will give you a personalised list of Brisbane suburbs that would be the best for you - based on those factors. There are also Sydney and Melbourne versions.

On the results page, there's also a map that colour-codes each suburb by star rating, for each factor. For instance here's the map for public transport. Five-star suburbs are in blue.



When you click on a suburb, you get the name and the star rating of that suburb - for whichever factor you select.



I find this to be so enlightening. I choose not to own a car. Some people find this shocking, tell me it's not possible, and complain that public transport is terrible. That surprises me, but when it turns out they live in a 2-star suburb (for public transport) it kind of makes sense. 

So when we are choosing our next place to live, we can choose the kind of area we like. It can provide the kind of lifestyle we want - and we could save a lot of commuting time and money by selecting an area that has the things we need. You could reduce the number of cars you need to own and maintain.

PS. If walkability is something you're interested in, you may also like to check out walkscore.com - where you can get a walkability score for your suburb, street and even street number. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

5 Reasons why we hoard - and they're wrong

"Less is More" is one of the catch-cries of downsizing. Often the fewer things we have the more we value them. So it's a great title for a book that's basically a manual for how to de-clutter your home. The introductory chapter of Less is More: How to De-clutter Your Life gives some great insights into why we find it so hard to reduce our stuff. Here are 5 of them - the last one is one of the biggest for me. 1. The cost of holding on. We were raised by our parents and grandparents and in their day items were expensive and space was cheap. It made sense in those days to hold onto stuff just in case you ever needed it. But today housing is expensive and items are cheap. It's hard to change a habit, but now we save much more by downsizing. 2. Keeping it in the family. For some reason we prefer to give things to those close to us. Again this was viable in the days of big families and lots of children to receive hand-me-downs. But these days we have smaller fa...

20 unplugged ideas

May 1-7 is Screen-Free Week . It's about spending time away from the screen and more time with each other - or doing things we love. It's a great chance to break the work-tired-watchTV-ads-shop-work cycle. This list of twenty alternative ideas is great for screen-free week. It's also a great reminder of things we could enjoy if we're shopping and spending less - and maybe working less and enjoying life more.

Will robots take your job?

The future could be very different. It's one reason I started this blog. What will technology mean for jobs? For incomes? For society? So I was excited to find Will Robots Take Your Job? at my local library. What does the book say? There's always been technological change and we've always found jobs. As the more laborious jobs were taken by machines, we took on higher skilled jobs, moving further up the "skill ladder". The main question is whether this time is different. Will the "skill ladder" continue to have higher rungs for humans to move on to? Will these rungs appear as quickly as the current rungs disappear? Either way we're headed for significant disruption. Either large-scale re-training of our workforce or massive unemployment. The author despairs that our leaders seem not to talk about this - and worse still, not have a plan for it. Farmers or horses? In 1870 about 75% of Americans worked in agriculture and used 25 million hors...