Skip to main content

How does facebook make you feel?

Given the choice, would you prefer to feel good or feel bad? The answer is not as obvious as you might think.

If someone said to me "Here's an activity that will make you feel worse about yourself", I don't think I'd take them up on the offer. Yet that's kind of what we do most days. Perhaps because we don't realise it.

How do we know?

One of Google's many great toys is predictive search function. You start typing something and instantly get suggestions. If I start typing my name, it suggests David Bowie, David Tennant, David Beckham and David Attenborough.

Here's what happens if I type "facebook makes me feel"


and "instagram makes me feel"


I find the differences interesting. It seems that facebook is the best if you want to feel like a failure or left out, while Instagram works better if you want to feel fat, inadequate or insecure. If you want to be feel depressed, lonely, or like a loser, then either platform can do that. :(

What does science say?

Although we often trust Google, there is also real research behind it. Psychology researchers compared people's hours on social media with their levels of happiness. There's a reasonably strong correlation between more happiness and fewer hours on social media. Actually it's twice as strong as the correlation between income and happiness. So it seems that reducing social media time is a surer path to happiness than a pay rise.

But is it chicken or egg? Could it be that sadder people just happen to spend lots of time on facebook and happier people have other things to do? They tested that too by measuring people before and after seeing social media content. People had lower self-esteem afterwards and thought less of themselves compared to other people.

But I can't go off Facebook

Yes it does seem like going off social media is the digital equivalent of living off-grid in a hut.

Some people do it. They're very intentional about keeping in phone contact with people close to them and use email for everything digital. Sure there's some stuff they'll miss out on, and they're OK with that.

If you are one of these people (or even if you're not) you can hit subscribe at the top of the page to get But Wait There's Less articles by email.

Facebook lite

One of the happiness-sucking traps is the facebook newsfeed. Mentally we compare other people's highlights to our everyday life. Obviously this is a self-esteem killer.

One way I avoid the newsfeed is to make facebook.com/notifications my bookmark. Instead of newsfeed being my default, I get a short list of notifications from people and pages that are important to me. Obviously you have to go through in advance and select which friends and pages you want to receive notifications about. For pages, like the But Wait There's Less facebook page, you'll find the notifications option in the Following dropdown menu.

Put the chocolate out of reach

OK, not the actual chocolate. But the theory is the same. If we make access harder, the chances are that we'll use it less. For social media this might mean deleting the apps off our phone. Or if that's too extreme, it might be putting them inside a folder, inside another folder, inside another folder...

If there's a genuine reason to use them we'll go to the effort of finding it. But if it's a meaningless or mindless browse, the extra effort might stop us from carelessly eroding our happiness for no reason.

What works for you

Have you got other tips for minimising your time on social media? Pop a note in the comments about how you avoid social media eating up too much of your time and happiness.

PS. If you're interesting in learning more about well-being and what really makes us happy why not try Yale's free online course.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to waste a year's wages

A friend recently asked me why it is that so many people (on good incomes) are struggling to save. Often the big three money areas are housing, transport and food. In one sense these are necessary items. But what we spend on them is often way more than necessary. I crunched some numbers on how much extra my wife and I could spend on these things - if for some reason we wanted to burn our money. 1. Housing Our apartment is fairly nice, but also cost-effective. I've mentioned how choosing it saves us $1,800 per year , compared to a similar one we saw. The high end of 2-bedroom apartments in our suburb is $305 per week more than our apartment. Not $305 per week. $305 per week more than ours is. I cannot get over that. Sure it's new and modern-looking, but that's a lot of money. It's an extra $15,860 per year above what we pay. 2. Transport The Australian Automobile Association lists the costs of owning and running a car. It includes many often-overlooked c

Don't dump on charities

Netflix causes mass dumping. Here's an alternative. January is usually a big month for physical donations to charity. In 2019 it's been over-the-top (literally) as charity donation bins have been overflowing with items. The Netflix series "Tidying Up" by famous declutterer Marie Kondo (see her book ) has inspired many to declutter their homes. But in the process they've cluttered the streets. What's so bad about donating? When the bins overflow the extra items are thrown away. Having been in the weather, the rain and on the ground, they are classified as contaminated and cannot be sold. To make it worse, much of what fills the bins is not good enough to sell, and is also dumped. Bad donations hurt charities 13 million dollars. That's how much it costs charities to deal with all the junk we dump on them - 60,000 tonnes a year. Lifeline says half its stores have stopped accepting donations. We might think we're helping, but that's a lot

This could all be yours

This cartoon kind of happened to me on the weekend. Joking about death My dad has his own unique sense of humour. Flippantly he joked that when he passes away, the first thing I'll need to do is get a rubbish skip (maybe two) and jam it full with all the junk from the garage. I was reminded of Marie Kondo, who says in her book that we have to deal with items either now or later; so it might as well be now. For people who have retired, I guess there's a third option: Ignore it for a few more decades and let descendants deal with it. Don't get me wrong - my dad has plenty of years left yet. But from his joke I'm guessing he's reasonably happy to let it all sit there while he enjoys retired life. Why not deal with it? I can kind of understand. It's an overwhelming task (even to look at). There's also the "I might need that" factor. Which is fair enough, but even if an item is needed, is it findable in amongst everything else? About half the