The Barefoot guide to happiness

There are three things that happy people have. Is more money one of them? Nope. Once your basic needs are met, extra money doesn't really make you happier. The three things are purpose, relationships and financial control, says author Scott Pape.

I've just finished his popular book The Barefoot Investor (2018 Update): The Only Money Guide You'll Ever Need. I expected mainly tips on saving, investing and the sharemarket. Those topics are covered, but a lot of his advice is
1. Don't buy so much stuff,
2. Buy the basic stuff not the flashy stuff, and
3. Don't get sucked in by advertising and salespeople.

He says millionaires drive average cars. People with flashy cars are generally not doing as well. ("All show and no dough")

Stop making the bankers rich

Credit cards don't help you get ahead or buy more. In fact they lock us in to a lifetime of debt and often people pay more in interest than they spend on the purchases. This mean our pay packet doesn't go as far because part of every pay goes to the credit card bill.

Buy a home not a property

Houses. Many people are trying to climb the property ladder - constantly trading up from one house to the next in search of the exclusive postcode. Instead of joy, all this brings is financial stress. They end up no happier than people in a standard house in an normal suburb.

Don't buy until it makes sense

Still on houses, he reckons we are over-obsessed with owning our own house. We're either scared that we have to buy now before prices go up, forced into it by social pressure, or worried that 'rent money is dead money'. He points out that paying interest on a mortgage is also dead money. So are the stamp duty, legal fees, rates and maintenance that come with purchasing a house.

He seems to advocate waiting until you find you place you want to live in "forever" and only to buy it if you can easily afford it.

More from Scott...

He also has something to say about health insurance and on how losing everything in a fire taught him about clutter.

Comments

How to waste a year's wages

A friend recently asked me why it is that so many people (on good incomes) are struggling to save. Often the big three money areas are housing, transport and food. In one sense these are necessary items. But what we spend on them is often way more than necessary. I crunched some numbers on how much extra my wife and I could spend on these things - if for some reason we wanted to burn our money. 1. Housing Our apartment is fairly nice, but also cost-effective. I've mentioned how choosing it saves us $1,800 per year , compared to a similar one we saw. The high end of 2-bedroom apartments in our suburb is $305 per week more than our apartment. Not $305 per week. $305 per week more than ours is. I cannot get over that. Sure it's new and modern-looking, but that's a lot of money. It's an extra $15,860 per year above what we pay. 2. Transport The Australian Automobile Association lists the costs of owning and running a car. It includes many often-overlooked c

Don't dump on charities

Netflix causes mass dumping. Here's an alternative. January is usually a big month for physical donations to charity. In 2019 it's been over-the-top (literally) as charity donation bins have been overflowing with items. The Netflix series "Tidying Up" by famous declutterer Marie Kondo (see her book ) has inspired many to declutter their homes. But in the process they've cluttered the streets. What's so bad about donating? When the bins overflow the extra items are thrown away. Having been in the weather, the rain and on the ground, they are classified as contaminated and cannot be sold. To make it worse, much of what fills the bins is not good enough to sell, and is also dumped. Bad donations hurt charities 13 million dollars. That's how much it costs charities to deal with all the junk we dump on them - 60,000 tonnes a year. Lifeline says half its stores have stopped accepting donations. We might think we're helping, but that's a lot

This could all be yours

This cartoon kind of happened to me on the weekend. Joking about death My dad has his own unique sense of humour. Flippantly he joked that when he passes away, the first thing I'll need to do is get a rubbish skip (maybe two) and jam it full with all the junk from the garage. I was reminded of Marie Kondo, who says in her book that we have to deal with items either now or later; so it might as well be now. For people who have retired, I guess there's a third option: Ignore it for a few more decades and let descendants deal with it. Don't get me wrong - my dad has plenty of years left yet. But from his joke I'm guessing he's reasonably happy to let it all sit there while he enjoys retired life. Why not deal with it? I can kind of understand. It's an overwhelming task (even to look at). There's also the "I might need that" factor. Which is fair enough, but even if an item is needed, is it findable in amongst everything else? About half the

But wait... there's less!

Search This Blog