Skip to main content

Are cooktops a waste of space?

Image
By
Who has ever had four saucepans cooking at once? So why do we have four hotplates on cooktops?

Back in the day of all-in-one units, four hotplates were a nice fit on the top of the oven. These days the cooktop and ovens are usually separate but we've stuck with four hotplates.

In many homes and apartments it's worth re-thinking. Is this is a wise use of bench space? Two-saucepan cooktops are making an appearance and freeing up some bench space in smaller kitchens.

Aldi are taking it a step further with the Induction Cooking Plate. It's a stand-alone single-hotplate device that can be packed away when not in use.


Aldi says it has 8 temperature settings, 5 preset cooking functions, a timer, touch controls and overheat protection.

Could this be the future of smaller kitchens? Cost-savings in building. More bench space. Less energy consumption with the efficiency of induction cooking.

Another great example of less is more.

I don't mean this to be an ad, but Aldi have these from Wednesday 27 June while stocks last. $49.99 with a 3 year warranty. Similar devices are at Target and Big W.
Read more about:

Comments

  1. Anonymous24 August 2018 at 19:30

    When I read this I said no way! I need 5! (just out of habit I suppose)

    After thinking about it, I think you're right, 2 would probably do it. I meal prep, portion and freeze most of the food, since doing this I've been able to move so many appliances off the kitchen bench knowing that I won't need it again for another 2 week and its been great to see the kitchen so clutter free.

    ReplyDelete
  2. david1 September 2018 at 15:44

    Hi Anonymous,
    Yes, so much of what we do is out of habit. I like your idea of making meals in bulk. Apart from clearing clutter, I imagine it also saves you a bunch of time and energy.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My mug shot

By
This is every mug I own. How many did I buy? Zero. They seem to just appear. I don't even drink tea or coffee. In winter I have might have a hot chocolate or cocoa. So 9 mugs seems like a lot. How does this happen? I reckon most mugs are gifts. There are two reasons for this. 1. It's a safe bet. People need to drink. It's kind of like buying your dad socks for father's day. But the difference is that socks wear out and need replacing. Cups don't. One of these mugs i received as a kid in the 90s. It still works fine. Now it has 8 friends. 2. It's often for what's on the mug. It might be a greeting card-style message, or a sports team logo, or something humorous. It's a good thing that something functional can also provide an inspiring message or pleasant memory as you use it. But the problem comes when we have too much. If I use the cup my sister gave me at Christmas, then I'm not using the 'awesome brother' one she already gave m...
2 comments
Read more

Adam ruins work

By
The TV show Adam Ruins Everything took a look at the workplace - and the 40 hour work week. It confirms my thoughts that the 40-hour work week (or at least it's relevance today) is a figment of our imagination. Very enlightening. Watch it now . The first 7 minutes are the most relevant. There were some astonishing stats coming out of it. For example, we spend only 45% of the work week doing our actual job (not including meetings etc). That's about 18 hours per week. Interestingly, that's what experts predicted. With rises in productivity, the 1950s brought talk of a 4-day work week. By 2030 they reckoned we might work just 15 hours per week. But instead we work longer hours. That results in more mistakes and safety mishaps. It also reduces brain function. We might think that it's being productive but Adam points to countries that have as much prosperity as America while working much shorter hours. A classic case of 'less is more'. PS. for the basis of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Investing Less, Earning More

By
Could investing $13,000 be better than investing $70,000? In this case, the answer seems to be yes. In Making Money Made Simple , Noel Whittaker compares two hypothetical investors: Person 1: Invests $ 1,000 a year from age 18-30. Person 2: Invests $ 2,000 a year from age 30-65. You might think that person 2 would be better off, but here's how it goes (in chart form): Person 1 stops investing at 30, but their investment keeps growing. At that point, person 1's yearly growth is more than person 2's yearly contribution. That's why person 2 never catches up. Person 1 ends up about $ 150,000 ahead, despite investing about one-fifth of what the person 2 invested. What if growth isn't so good? These calculations assume 10% growth. What if it isn't that high? Fair point. I've run the numbers at lower rates of growth. At 9%, person 1 is still better off. At 8% it's close, and person 2 comes out slightly ahead. But that's not really the poin...
2 comments
Read more