How to halve your tax rate

I do 3 days of paid work per week. I find it to be a good balance between earning some income and having free time to do the things I enjoy.

Today I discovered another advantage. An average 5-day worker pays around 18% tax. An average 3-day worker pays just 9%. Here's why.

The more you earn the more tax you pay. Here in Australia we pay no tax on the first $18,200. But after that each chunk of money is taxed at higher rates.

Tax-free Mondays

Think of it this way. The average wage is $231 a day. Working just one day per week, that would be tax-free. Work a second day and you lose $20 in tax. By the time you get to a 4th or 5th day the tax (on those days) is about a third of what you earn.

I think this is partly why some new parents work fewer days. After paying all that tax and then childcare fees, it's just not worth their time to do a fourth or fifth day - because their true wage is hardly anything on those 4th and 5th days.

The same goes for people who just have other priorities in life. Even though a fourth or fifth day is extra money - it's also extra time lost. The fifth day is just as long as all the others - but for far less pay. Is it still worth it?

It can get to a point where the smaller amount of money is not as valuable as the chunk of life it is taking away from me. After all, who gets to the end of their life and says "I wish I'd spent more time at the office"?

Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. The graph and numbers are a simplified illustration for someone on $60k with no other income. IT is also based on Australian tax rates at the time of writing.

Comments

How to waste a year's wages

A friend recently asked me why it is that so many people (on good incomes) are struggling to save. Often the big three money areas are housing, transport and food. In one sense these are necessary items. But what we spend on them is often way more than necessary. I crunched some numbers on how much extra my wife and I could spend on these things - if for some reason we wanted to burn our money. 1. Housing Our apartment is fairly nice, but also cost-effective. I've mentioned how choosing it saves us $1,800 per year , compared to a similar one we saw. The high end of 2-bedroom apartments in our suburb is $305 per week more than our apartment. Not $305 per week. $305 per week more than ours is. I cannot get over that. Sure it's new and modern-looking, but that's a lot of money. It's an extra $15,860 per year above what we pay. 2. Transport The Australian Automobile Association lists the costs of owning and running a car. It includes many often-overlooked c

Don't dump on charities

Netflix causes mass dumping. Here's an alternative. January is usually a big month for physical donations to charity. In 2019 it's been over-the-top (literally) as charity donation bins have been overflowing with items. The Netflix series "Tidying Up" by famous declutterer Marie Kondo (see her book ) has inspired many to declutter their homes. But in the process they've cluttered the streets. What's so bad about donating? When the bins overflow the extra items are thrown away. Having been in the weather, the rain and on the ground, they are classified as contaminated and cannot be sold. To make it worse, much of what fills the bins is not good enough to sell, and is also dumped. Bad donations hurt charities 13 million dollars. That's how much it costs charities to deal with all the junk we dump on them - 60,000 tonnes a year. Lifeline says half its stores have stopped accepting donations. We might think we're helping, but that's a lot

This could all be yours

This cartoon kind of happened to me on the weekend. Joking about death My dad has his own unique sense of humour. Flippantly he joked that when he passes away, the first thing I'll need to do is get a rubbish skip (maybe two) and jam it full with all the junk from the garage. I was reminded of Marie Kondo, who says in her book that we have to deal with items either now or later; so it might as well be now. For people who have retired, I guess there's a third option: Ignore it for a few more decades and let descendants deal with it. Don't get me wrong - my dad has plenty of years left yet. But from his joke I'm guessing he's reasonably happy to let it all sit there while he enjoys retired life. Why not deal with it? I can kind of understand. It's an overwhelming task (even to look at). There's also the "I might need that" factor. Which is fair enough, but even if an item is needed, is it findable in amongst everything else? About half the

But wait... there's less!

Search This Blog