Skip to main content

How to never worry about the share market

The Ulysses Contract doesn't sound like a book about investing. The subtitle "How to never worry about the share market again" is what grabbed my attention.


The book is mostly about the mindset and strategy of investing in shares. The obscure title refers to Greek mythology, the temptation of the siren songs, and the measures Ulysses took to keep his ship and crew safe - including being tied to the mast of the ship, to hold himself to his own plan.

In the book, Michael Kemp outlines the temptations (siren songs) in the share market, gives some solid guiding principles (the mast) that investors can secure themselves to, and outlines his idea of a Ulysses contract for investing.

The temptations include

  • spending too much on consumer items (it's hard to invest if we spend all our income)
  • doing what everyone else is doing (when the crowd is selling, it might be the best time to buy)
  • expert predictions (not worth that much, and can be wrong as much as right)
  • market-timing, stock-picking and day-trading (all quite hard to do, and we're unlikely to do better than average)
  • pin-striped suits (in most cases the fees investment companies charge aren't reflected in higher returns)
  • high returns with the latest technology (so many times the latest tech provides good short term returns - until the bubble bursts)

The mast includes principles of

  • diversification (having eggs in many different baskets)
  • reversion to the mean (crazy high and lows come back to normality)
  • history (some knowledge of history provides wisdom and can be an antidote to panic or worry)
  • patience ("human nature desires quick results" but "great operators do nothing in a hurry")
  • compound interest (over time, investments can really snowball)
  • great investors don't need to be champions (investing in a broad index fund can give a great results over time without being a genius investor)
  • passive management and low fees (high fees can erode the growth of an investment)

Farms not Casinos

This is one of the major principles of the author's mindset. Too often news media talks about share prices going up or down today, this week or this month. Short term wins and losses, like a casino.

Instead the author views investing like owning farms. Farmers don't sell the farm because of one month's bad rainfall. They own farms and reap a harvest year after year. His view is that this is how we should see investing. Work out how big a farm we need to supply our needs and build it.

Superannuation and Ulysses

The author sees Australia's superannuation system as a great example of the Ulysses contract. Our employer put money in regularly (we can too) and the fact that we can't touch it prevents us from messing it up.

In short

The Ulysses Contract is an easy-to-read book and offers guidance for everyday people who want to invest but aren't investing experts. The author focusses more on mindset more than the nitty-gritty of business and finance, because he sees mindset as far more crucial for investing.

Related reading

If you like the sound of this, then you might also want to check out The Latte Factor.

See my other book reviews or subscribe to my monthly-ish email for future ones.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to waste a year's wages

A friend recently asked me why it is that so many people (on good incomes) are struggling to save. Often the big three money areas are housing, transport and food. In one sense these are necessary items. But what we spend on them is often way more than necessary. I crunched some numbers on how much extra my wife and I could spend on these things - if for some reason we wanted to burn our money. 1. Housing Our apartment is fairly nice, but also cost-effective. I've mentioned how choosing it saves us $1,800 per year , compared to a similar one we saw. The high end of 2-bedroom apartments in our suburb is $305 per week more than our apartment. Not $305 per week. $305 per week more than ours is. I cannot get over that. Sure it's new and modern-looking, but that's a lot of money. It's an extra $15,860 per year above what we pay. 2. Transport The Australian Automobile Association lists the costs of owning and running a car. It includes many often-overlooked c

Don't dump on charities

Netflix causes mass dumping. Here's an alternative. January is usually a big month for physical donations to charity. In 2019 it's been over-the-top (literally) as charity donation bins have been overflowing with items. The Netflix series "Tidying Up" by famous declutterer Marie Kondo (see her book ) has inspired many to declutter their homes. But in the process they've cluttered the streets. What's so bad about donating? When the bins overflow the extra items are thrown away. Having been in the weather, the rain and on the ground, they are classified as contaminated and cannot be sold. To make it worse, much of what fills the bins is not good enough to sell, and is also dumped. Bad donations hurt charities 13 million dollars. That's how much it costs charities to deal with all the junk we dump on them - 60,000 tonnes a year. Lifeline says half its stores have stopped accepting donations. We might think we're helping, but that's a lot

This could all be yours

This cartoon kind of happened to me on the weekend. Joking about death My dad has his own unique sense of humour. Flippantly he joked that when he passes away, the first thing I'll need to do is get a rubbish skip (maybe two) and jam it full with all the junk from the garage. I was reminded of Marie Kondo, who says in her book that we have to deal with items either now or later; so it might as well be now. For people who have retired, I guess there's a third option: Ignore it for a few more decades and let descendants deal with it. Don't get me wrong - my dad has plenty of years left yet. But from his joke I'm guessing he's reasonably happy to let it all sit there while he enjoys retired life. Why not deal with it? I can kind of understand. It's an overwhelming task (even to look at). There's also the "I might need that" factor. Which is fair enough, but even if an item is needed, is it findable in amongst everything else? About half the