Skip to main content

Space Invaders - a deeper look

Here in Australia, there's a new TV show -- Space Invaders. The expert team visits ordinary families and help them declutter their home and improve their lives.

Just one episode in and it's already a must-watch for me.


Meet the Team

"Declutter Guru" Peter Walsh is accompanied by renovation expert Cherie Barber and treasure hunter Lucas Callaghan. Their mission is to help households remove clutter, renovate the decluttered space and maybe find some treasures along the way.

Episode one

Empty-nesters Julie and Pete were in need of help. Julie's birthday presents lived on the dining table as there was nowhere for them to go.

The spare room had barely enough floor space to walk in. The main bedroom was not much better. Pete's clothes were stored in the living room.

Julie herself admitted "each thing I recognise and love - but as a whole it's just become a bit of a mess".

So what did they lose?

Julie's nine racks of clothes were reduced to three. The 110 boxes of stuff were reduced to 11 boxes. Julie admits, that she "couldn't tell you what was missing".

I resonate with that. My wife and I have sold more than 530 items. Yet if we had to list what they were, it would take me all day to think of 50 (if I'm lucky).

It's odd that we cling to so much because we think it's valuable to us. But when it's gone we don't even remember it.

Like a holiday house

Julie's described her new-look bedroom as "like a holiday house" because it looked so relaxing. Not because of the decorating (though that helped) but because the clutter had (unknowingly) caused so much stress. Without it, home seemed like a holiday. 

I've sometimes thought this when on holiday. The accommodation often has a relaxed vibe - even if there's no ocean view. I've wondered how much just comes down to the absence of clutter.

Tips from the experts

Peter Walsh has three rules that a piece of clothing must have. It must be something (1) you love, (2) that fits you now, and (3) people say you look great in it.

He also says that "memory clutter" is the hardest to deal with. We fear that "if we let go of the object we'll lose the memory".

Coincidentally, I've just finished reading a book on memories (making them and keeping them). That'll be an article coming up soon. Suffice to say that there's heaps of ways to keep memories that don't involve hanging onto a house full of clutter.

Getting rid of the excess

So the other 99 boxes ended up going to "donation". Lucas estimated it was worth about $11,000 and mentioned that they could have made that money if they could be bothered selling their items.

Whilst he praised them for effectively making such a donation to charity, it's questionable whether the charity has enough room to store it all. Or if the charity shop has enough customers to sell it all before the next load of donations arrives.

Fortunately, he did also praise them for donating quality, good-condition items, saying that donating is "like you were giving it to a family member or friend". That is to say, don't give them junk. (See my article Don't dump on charities).

Lost gold

In sorting through the piles clutter, Lucas also found a 24-carat gold bracelet ($300 - $500 worth) and some silver also worth $500.

Whether it's financial value or emotional value, it's surprising the valuable items that we have - but are like needles in a haystack. What's the point of having them if we can never find them?

The change

It seemed that Julie and Pete's lives were much improved by this visit from the space invaders. Their bedroom was now a joy to be in, their living room featured a small number of key sentimental items, there is enough space for the adult kids to come and have a meal together, and the spare room is perfect for the granddaughter to sleep over.

It's amazing that all that can come from reducing the amount of stuff we don't even need.

The future

This is just the first episode of this show. I'm sure I'll have something to say about future episodes. To hear about that, or be notified when I review the memories book, sign up to my monthly email update.

Find out more about the Space Invaders.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Don't dump on charities

Netflix causes mass dumping. Here's an alternative. January is usually a big month for physical donations to charity. In 2019 it's been over-the-top (literally) as charity donation bins have been overflowing with items. The Netflix series "Tidying Up" by famous declutterer Marie Kondo (see her book ) has inspired many to declutter their homes. But in the process they've cluttered the streets. What's so bad about donating? When the bins overflow the extra items are thrown away. Having been in the weather, the rain and on the ground, they are classified as contaminated and cannot be sold. To make it worse, much of what fills the bins is not good enough to sell, and is also dumped. Bad donations hurt charities 13 million dollars. That's how much it costs charities to deal with all the junk we dump on them - 60,000 tonnes a year. Lifeline says half its stores have stopped accepting donations. We might think we're helping, but that's a lot

How to waste a year's wages

A friend recently asked me why it is that so many people (on good incomes) are struggling to save. Often the big three money areas are housing, transport and food. In one sense these are necessary items. But what we spend on them is often way more than necessary. I crunched some numbers on how much extra my wife and I could spend on these things - if for some reason we wanted to burn our money. 1. Housing Our apartment is fairly nice, but also cost-effective. I've mentioned how choosing it saves us $1,800 per year , compared to a similar one we saw. The high end of 2-bedroom apartments in our suburb is $305 per week more than our apartment. Not $305 per week. $305 per week more than ours is. I cannot get over that. Sure it's new and modern-looking, but that's a lot of money. It's an extra $15,860 per year above what we pay. 2. Transport The Australian Automobile Association lists the costs of owning and running a car. It includes many often-overlooked c

This could all be yours

This cartoon kind of happened to me on the weekend. Joking about death My dad has his own unique sense of humour. Flippantly he joked that when he passes away, the first thing I'll need to do is get a rubbish skip (maybe two) and jam it full with all the junk from the garage. I was reminded of Marie Kondo, who says in her book that we have to deal with items either now or later; so it might as well be now. For people who have retired, I guess there's a third option: Ignore it for a few more decades and let descendants deal with it. Don't get me wrong - my dad has plenty of years left yet. But from his joke I'm guessing he's reasonably happy to let it all sit there while he enjoys retired life. Why not deal with it? I can kind of understand. It's an overwhelming task (even to look at). There's also the "I might need that" factor. Which is fair enough, but even if an item is needed, is it findable in amongst everything else? About half the