Skip to main content

Is private school the best option?

It's back-to-school time here in Australia. If it's a private school, it's time to pay school fees.

An investment

Some schools describe their fees as "an investment" in the child's future. If it's an investment, let's compare it to other investments. What else could we provide for our kids for the same cost?


Other options

Scott Pape recommends investments bonds for investing on behalf of children. As they grow up, there's a range of funds to invest in shares. Or they can put it in their own superannuation (retirement) account, so we know they'll be OK even after we're gone.

Investment rate

My superannuation account returns 10.2% over the long term - and that's after fees and taxes. But that's probably better than most.

To be really conservative I'm going to assume a much lower 8%, as taxes are generally higher outside of superannuation. Bear in mind these are not exact calculations - we're just trying to get some ball-park figures.

School 1 - Relatively affordable

A relative of mine attends a fairly affordable local Christian school. The total tuition fees, up to year 9, come to $27,975.

If each year the parents invested the same amount as that year's fee, the kid could have $133,000 at age 30, or $287,000 at age 40.

What if we invest for retirement?

If at age 16 years, we give the kid an amount equal to their total school fees - in this case $27,975. Invested in the kid's superannuation, 50 years later it could be $1.33 million.

No matter how many times I check my maths, I am astounded by how much that is. But it shouldn't be such a surprise. Time is a powerful asset in the investing world, and kids have more of that than anyone.

School 2 - Middle range

OK, but what about a typical private school? My friend sends her kids to a primary school (P-6) that charges $7472 per year for a total cost of $52,304 - for primary school only.

The same calculations as before now give results of:
At 30: $287,000
At 40: $621,000
At retirement: $2.45 million

That's just for primary school. Even if we assume high school is the same price (normally it's higher) then 13 years of schooling costs $97,136. Again, investing these fees could give the following amounts:

At 30: $437,000
At 40: $943,000
At retirement: $4.55 million

This is where I start to wonder which is better for a kid; private schooling or nearly a million dollars at age 40. But let's continue.

School 3 - High end

A "prestigious" private school near me charges $18,182 for prep, climbing up to $24,116 for year 12. This is where the numbers get really eye-watering. The total bill is $281,654. Ouch!

Again, investing that money could have really big outcomes.
At 30: $1.23 million
At 40: $2.65 million
At retirement: $13.2 million

What should a parent do?

Some of those numbers are absolutely staggering.

Obviously we want our kids to have a great education. It can help set them up for a great future. As could the ability to buy a property outright at age 30. As could having the money to start their own business. Or a nest egg to support them while raising their own children. Or having retirement fully taken care of. Or being able to retire at a time of their choosing.

It's hard to know what would benefit our kids more - private schooling, or a six or seven-figure sum of money.

It's not either/or

It doesn't have to be one or the other. Some parents can do both, but that can be really expensive.

Perhaps a more affordable school allows us to invest partially in education and partially in other ways that could really help our kids later on.

Big disclaimer

Obviously this is not intended as financial advice or even parental advice. I'm just running some hypothetical numbers to give an indication what else could be achieved with the kind of money we spend on school fees.

Obviously returns can vary from year-to-year and from investment-to-investment. Please take this into consideration. The numbers quoted are based on the assumptions I outlined and could vary significantly. I also haven't taken inflation into account. These are intended as ball-park figures to illustrate the scale of what's possible, with this kind of money and the time available to young people.

PS. If you'd be interested in your own calculator where you can enter your own figures, let me know in the comments. If there's some interest, I'll put one online. You can also get my monthly-ish email updates, so you'll know when it's available.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to waste a year's wages

A friend recently asked me why it is that so many people (on good incomes) are struggling to save. Often the big three money areas are housing, transport and food. In one sense these are necessary items. But what we spend on them is often way more than necessary. I crunched some numbers on how much extra my wife and I could spend on these things - if for some reason we wanted to burn our money. 1. Housing Our apartment is fairly nice, but also cost-effective. I've mentioned how choosing it saves us $1,800 per year , compared to a similar one we saw. The high end of 2-bedroom apartments in our suburb is $305 per week more than our apartment. Not $305 per week. $305 per week more than ours is. I cannot get over that. Sure it's new and modern-looking, but that's a lot of money. It's an extra $15,860 per year above what we pay. 2. Transport The Australian Automobile Association lists the costs of owning and running a car. It includes many often-overlooked c

Don't dump on charities

Netflix causes mass dumping. Here's an alternative. January is usually a big month for physical donations to charity. In 2019 it's been over-the-top (literally) as charity donation bins have been overflowing with items. The Netflix series "Tidying Up" by famous declutterer Marie Kondo (see her book ) has inspired many to declutter their homes. But in the process they've cluttered the streets. What's so bad about donating? When the bins overflow the extra items are thrown away. Having been in the weather, the rain and on the ground, they are classified as contaminated and cannot be sold. To make it worse, much of what fills the bins is not good enough to sell, and is also dumped. Bad donations hurt charities 13 million dollars. That's how much it costs charities to deal with all the junk we dump on them - 60,000 tonnes a year. Lifeline says half its stores have stopped accepting donations. We might think we're helping, but that's a lot

This could all be yours

This cartoon kind of happened to me on the weekend. Joking about death My dad has his own unique sense of humour. Flippantly he joked that when he passes away, the first thing I'll need to do is get a rubbish skip (maybe two) and jam it full with all the junk from the garage. I was reminded of Marie Kondo, who says in her book that we have to deal with items either now or later; so it might as well be now. For people who have retired, I guess there's a third option: Ignore it for a few more decades and let descendants deal with it. Don't get me wrong - my dad has plenty of years left yet. But from his joke I'm guessing he's reasonably happy to let it all sit there while he enjoys retired life. Why not deal with it? I can kind of understand. It's an overwhelming task (even to look at). There's also the "I might need that" factor. Which is fair enough, but even if an item is needed, is it findable in amongst everything else? About half the