Is it really worth it?

One of the secrets to this lifestyle is determining whether things provide value for their cost.

Weighing up the cost

Cost is not just money. It's the hassle of buying it, the space to store it, the time to clean and maintain it and, for the eco-conscious, the impact of disposing of it later. Is it worth all that cost for the benefit it brings?

What ads say

The trick is that society (particularly advertising) will tell you the opposite. Provided you have the money - and often even if you don't - something that brings any value at all is something we are urged to buy.

Sometimes it's even just the slim chance of a tiny amount of value. This current ad is a classic example. Telstra, an Australian telco, is known for its comprehensive area coverage, particularly in remote areas.

The proposition seems to be that you should pay for this extra coverage incase:

You are a footy fan, AND
you're in a remote area on game night, AND
the power goes out during the game, AND
no-one else at the venue has Telstra (despite it being Australia's most popular telco), AND
the game must absolutely be watched live, AND
your phone has sufficient charge to last the rest of the game.

Highly unlikely

That's a very unlikely sequence of events. Even as someone who watches a fair amount of sport, I'm very confident I'll go the rest of my life without it ever happening.

Not a big deal

Even as a sports fan, there are far worse things in life than missing half a TV game. Ads like this are really just exploiting our FOMO.

A better alternative

Recently I've been reading Digital Minimalism* by Cal Newport. I imagine he'd suggest that instead of going to extreme lengths to feed our addiction to more screen time, that the fans (when the power goes out) could gather around and share stories about their love of the game and their favourite football memories.

The social interaction would be far more meaningful than everyone staring at one mobile screen for an hour - and half of the people being upset about their team losing.

*Soon I'll be publishing my review of Digital Minimalism (it's great read). Follow on facebook, or subscribe at the top of the screen to be notified when I've written it.

Comments

How to waste a year's wages

A friend recently asked me why it is that so many people (on good incomes) are struggling to save. Often the big three money areas are housing, transport and food. In one sense these are necessary items. But what we spend on them is often way more than necessary. I crunched some numbers on how much extra my wife and I could spend on these things - if for some reason we wanted to burn our money. 1. Housing Our apartment is fairly nice, but also cost-effective. I've mentioned how choosing it saves us $1,800 per year , compared to a similar one we saw. The high end of 2-bedroom apartments in our suburb is $305 per week more than our apartment. Not $305 per week. $305 per week more than ours is. I cannot get over that. Sure it's new and modern-looking, but that's a lot of money. It's an extra $15,860 per year above what we pay. 2. Transport The Australian Automobile Association lists the costs of owning and running a car. It includes many often-overlooked c...

How much super will we have?

Will we be OK in old age? How much will we have? One of the great things about living in Australia is superannuation. Our employers are required to pay into an investment account for our retirement. In recent times, my wife and I have been in several conversations with friends who are wondering (or worried) if their balance will be enough. That's what inspired this article. Great question It's a great question to ask, especially around the age of 35 to 40. At that point, old age is less of a distant abstract concept. It's becoming a medium-term reality. At 35 the number of years of living off super is possibly more than half of your remaining years. At 40 you may consider yourself about half way through your working life. Looking at your balance, it's easy to think that twice that balance may not be enough. Read on, because I have good news for you. It's better than you might think As I've mentioned in earlier posts, compound growth means the investment grows f...

Why millionaires don't "feel" rich

We're wealthier than ever - so why don't we feel like it? Australia has gone almost three decades without recession. The stock market recently hit a record high. Our wages are record highs. Home loan rates are at record lows. We live in one of the richest countries in the world at the richest point in history. So what's wrong? Comparison Wealth is relative. So what do we compare to? Where we expect to be? "When your wages growth is only 2 or 3 per cent, you don't feel as well-off as when it's going up 10 per cent. That's that nominal distortion that people often suffer from" , says economist Shane Oliver, and that "expectations have grown a lot faster than reality." We're earning more than last year, but we want even more. So compared to our imaginary situation, we see ourselves as worse off. What we see around us? Shane Oliver again. "If you think about it - Australians today are a lot wealthier. They're living far ric...

But wait... there's less!

Search This Blog