Is it really worth it?

One of the secrets to this lifestyle is determining whether things provide value for their cost.

Weighing up the cost

Cost is not just money. It's the hassle of buying it, the space to store it, the time to clean and maintain it and, for the eco-conscious, the impact of disposing of it later. Is it worth all that cost for the benefit it brings?

What ads say

The trick is that society (particularly advertising) will tell you the opposite. Provided you have the money - and often even if you don't - something that brings any value at all is something we are urged to buy.

Sometimes it's even just the slim chance of a tiny amount of value. This current ad is a classic example. Telstra, an Australian telco, is known for its comprehensive area coverage, particularly in remote areas.

The proposition seems to be that you should pay for this extra coverage incase:

You are a footy fan, AND
you're in a remote area on game night, AND
the power goes out during the game, AND
no-one else at the venue has Telstra (despite it being Australia's most popular telco), AND
the game must absolutely be watched live, AND
your phone has sufficient charge to last the rest of the game.

Highly unlikely

That's a very unlikely sequence of events. Even as someone who watches a fair amount of sport, I'm very confident I'll go the rest of my life without it ever happening.

Not a big deal

Even as a sports fan, there are far worse things in life than missing half a TV game. Ads like this are really just exploiting our FOMO.

A better alternative

Recently I've been reading Digital Minimalism* by Cal Newport. I imagine he'd suggest that instead of going to extreme lengths to feed our addiction to more screen time, that the fans (when the power goes out) could gather around and share stories about their love of the game and their favourite football memories.

The social interaction would be far more meaningful than everyone staring at one mobile screen for an hour - and half of the people being upset about their team losing.

*Soon I'll be publishing my review of Digital Minimalism (it's great read). Follow on facebook, or subscribe at the top of the screen to be notified when I've written it.

Comments

How to waste a year's wages

A friend recently asked me why it is that so many people (on good incomes) are struggling to save. Often the big three money areas are housing, transport and food. In one sense these are necessary items. But what we spend on them is often way more than necessary. I crunched some numbers on how much extra my wife and I could spend on these things - if for some reason we wanted to burn our money. 1. Housing Our apartment is fairly nice, but also cost-effective. I've mentioned how choosing it saves us $1,800 per year , compared to a similar one we saw. The high end of 2-bedroom apartments in our suburb is $305 per week more than our apartment. Not $305 per week. $305 per week more than ours is. I cannot get over that. Sure it's new and modern-looking, but that's a lot of money. It's an extra $15,860 per year above what we pay. 2. Transport The Australian Automobile Association lists the costs of owning and running a car. It includes many often-overlooked c

Don't dump on charities

Netflix causes mass dumping. Here's an alternative. January is usually a big month for physical donations to charity. In 2019 it's been over-the-top (literally) as charity donation bins have been overflowing with items. The Netflix series "Tidying Up" by famous declutterer Marie Kondo (see her book ) has inspired many to declutter their homes. But in the process they've cluttered the streets. What's so bad about donating? When the bins overflow the extra items are thrown away. Having been in the weather, the rain and on the ground, they are classified as contaminated and cannot be sold. To make it worse, much of what fills the bins is not good enough to sell, and is also dumped. Bad donations hurt charities 13 million dollars. That's how much it costs charities to deal with all the junk we dump on them - 60,000 tonnes a year. Lifeline says half its stores have stopped accepting donations. We might think we're helping, but that's a lot

This could all be yours

This cartoon kind of happened to me on the weekend. Joking about death My dad has his own unique sense of humour. Flippantly he joked that when he passes away, the first thing I'll need to do is get a rubbish skip (maybe two) and jam it full with all the junk from the garage. I was reminded of Marie Kondo, who says in her book that we have to deal with items either now or later; so it might as well be now. For people who have retired, I guess there's a third option: Ignore it for a few more decades and let descendants deal with it. Don't get me wrong - my dad has plenty of years left yet. But from his joke I'm guessing he's reasonably happy to let it all sit there while he enjoys retired life. Why not deal with it? I can kind of understand. It's an overwhelming task (even to look at). There's also the "I might need that" factor. Which is fair enough, but even if an item is needed, is it findable in amongst everything else? About half the

But wait... there's less!

Search This Blog