Skip to main content

The Less Stress Lifestyle

Carl was chasing his dream of becoming a millionaire. He had severe anxiety and stress.

His book, Less-Stress Lifestyle is his recipe for reducing stress. A lot his answers are about having less.

Less Clutter Less Stress

"The things we own end up owning us."

Carl advises us to "start getting wise about the stuff you own and future purchases". For instance he scaled down his wardrobe to only the items he regularly wears - and now only buys quality items that he wears often. He saves money by not buying things he'd rarely or never wear.

"Clutter prevents focus" he says, and focus is one of his keys to having less stress. As well as the home and office, he say it's important to declutter the brain.

Writing his problems down clears them from his mind. Then his brain can focus on dealing with each problem (one at a time) rather than getting anxious and stressed about them.

Less TV Less anxiety

"One of the biggest challenges we face today is being who we really want to be. We're influenced by endless external sources (such as the media and popular TV programmes) to wear the right clothes, drive the right car, look a certain way, and be the next A-list celeb. Money drives all these things, and the perception is that the more money you have, the better life will be. I learned the hard way that this is absolute rubbish."

We're naturally grateful for what we have, and want to improve our life, but much of TV and media distorts our desires and just uses us to sell products or boost their ratings.

Carl also points out that we can reallocate TV time to invest in ourselves by reading a book or doing a hobby we enjoy. This is a much better pay-off for our self-improvement and happiness.

Who wants to be a millionaire?

"If it means being financially and emotionally free, yes why not? If it means working every hour under the sun and being owned by the very thing I thought was giving me freedom, then no thanks."

It makes sense doesn't it? A bank account of a million dollars doesn't mean much if we sacrifice our happiness to get it. Carl gives an example of two people - one earning a meagre wage but happy and another making millions but very much paying a personal price. It was obvious who had the better life.

Even in America, studies have shown that after a certain level of income, more money brings no increase in happiness. It seems that once you have what you need, the extra money doesn't add any extra joy - just extra responsibilities.

In the studies, the amount was around $75,000 a year - but I suppose that varies according to the person's actual needs.

Take home message

The overall theme of the book seems to be to focus on the things that actually improve your life. Don't waste time (and sanity) chasing things that supposedly bring you happiness but actually don't.

Good advice.

PS. If you've are looking to sell items online (either as a lesson for kids or to cash in some unwanted possessions) you may want to grab a free copy of my ebook Less Clutter More Cash for tips.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to waste a year's wages

A friend recently asked me why it is that so many people (on good incomes) are struggling to save. Often the big three money areas are housing, transport and food. In one sense these are necessary items. But what we spend on them is often way more than necessary. I crunched some numbers on how much extra my wife and I could spend on these things - if for some reason we wanted to burn our money. 1. Housing Our apartment is fairly nice, but also cost-effective. I've mentioned how choosing it saves us $1,800 per year , compared to a similar one we saw. The high end of 2-bedroom apartments in our suburb is $305 per week more than our apartment. Not $305 per week. $305 per week more than ours is. I cannot get over that. Sure it's new and modern-looking, but that's a lot of money. It's an extra $15,860 per year above what we pay. 2. Transport The Australian Automobile Association lists the costs of owning and running a car. It includes many often-overlooked c

Don't dump on charities

Netflix causes mass dumping. Here's an alternative. January is usually a big month for physical donations to charity. In 2019 it's been over-the-top (literally) as charity donation bins have been overflowing with items. The Netflix series "Tidying Up" by famous declutterer Marie Kondo (see her book ) has inspired many to declutter their homes. But in the process they've cluttered the streets. What's so bad about donating? When the bins overflow the extra items are thrown away. Having been in the weather, the rain and on the ground, they are classified as contaminated and cannot be sold. To make it worse, much of what fills the bins is not good enough to sell, and is also dumped. Bad donations hurt charities 13 million dollars. That's how much it costs charities to deal with all the junk we dump on them - 60,000 tonnes a year. Lifeline says half its stores have stopped accepting donations. We might think we're helping, but that's a lot

This could all be yours

This cartoon kind of happened to me on the weekend. Joking about death My dad has his own unique sense of humour. Flippantly he joked that when he passes away, the first thing I'll need to do is get a rubbish skip (maybe two) and jam it full with all the junk from the garage. I was reminded of Marie Kondo, who says in her book that we have to deal with items either now or later; so it might as well be now. For people who have retired, I guess there's a third option: Ignore it for a few more decades and let descendants deal with it. Don't get me wrong - my dad has plenty of years left yet. But from his joke I'm guessing he's reasonably happy to let it all sit there while he enjoys retired life. Why not deal with it? I can kind of understand. It's an overwhelming task (even to look at). There's also the "I might need that" factor. Which is fair enough, but even if an item is needed, is it findable in amongst everything else? About half the