Skip to main content

The rule of 72

Here's a superquick way to work out how much money your investments might make.

No need for fancy exponential maths. Just simple division and some doubling. Maybe you can even do it it your head.

The rule of 72

Years to double = 72 / growth rate

That's it. Pretty simple. Just 72 divided by a number.

Working out the double-time

So a 2% investment would take 36 years to double in value. (72 divided by 2)

At 6% it would take 12 years, and at 8% it would take 9 years.

How many doubles?

Let's say someone is investing $50k for 36 years.

  • At 2%, it would double once. Result $100k.

  • At 6%, it would double three times. (36 years divided by 12 years).
    Three doubles means it becomes 100k, 200k, then $400k.

  • At 8%, it would double four times. (36 years divided by 9 years).
    Four doubles means it becomes 100k, 200k, 400k, then $800k.

This is astounding

I was stunned when I first came across this. I probably still am.

It's amazing to think that moving from 2% to 6% changes things a $50k gain into a $350k gain. That's triple the rate of growth, but seven times the amount of earnings.

Perhaps even weirder is that the small percentage change (from 6% to 8%) adds another $400k.

I guess that's the awesome power of doubling.

Real-world effect

Discovering this has motivated me on to invest more money. I had most of my money just sitting in savings accounts. I had intended to invest, but hadn't got around to it. (To be clear I'm talking about money that I won't need to spend for years).

Then I saw the maths. Even by investing a smaller amount (compared to the earlier example) and for a shorter time; the long-term benefit is greater than a year's wages. Realising that fact really drove the message home.

If making that investment has the same financial effect as working for a whole year, I know which I'd prefer to do. What a simple way to free up a year of my life, with no damage to my long-term financial health.

Starting early

While I discovered the rule of 72 only recently, those who discover it at a younger age have a real benefit. The early someone starts, the more doubling they can do. It could make an enormous difference to their future selves.

But wait, there's less

This is not about become a mega-multi-millionaire. This is about realising that there are different ways to fund our life.

We don't have to trade away all our time for money. We can spend more of our time doing meaningful things, helping others, and generally doing the things that light us up.

Hopefully we can use the rule of 72 to make sure we're not trapped in a job until 72.

More on Money

This is part of my money maths series. Not financial advice. Just showing the simple maths that can make a real difference to our lives.

For a more detailed way to calculated investment returns, see the magic of compound growth.

For future articles, subscribe to my monthly(-ish) email.

Disclaimer

This information is general in nature and does not take into account your personal situation. It is not financial advice. If you need specific advice on your circumstances or finances you should speak to an expert.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How much super will we have?

Will we be OK in old age? How much will we have? One of the great things about living in Australia is superannuation. Our employers are required to pay into an investment account for our retirement. In recent times, my wife and I have been in several conversations with friends who are wondering (or worried) if their balance will be enough. That's what inspired this article. Great question It's a great question to ask, especially around the age of 35 to 40. At that point, old age is less of a distant abstract concept. It's becoming a medium-term reality. At 35 the number of years of living off super is possibly more than half of your remaining years. At 40 you may consider yourself about half way through your working life. Looking at your balance, it's easy to think that twice that balance may not be enough.  Read on, because I have good news for you. It's better than you might think As I've mentioned in earlier posts, compound growth means the investment grows f

What is clutter anyway?

Today we're doing some cleaning up of the apartment, so this quote about clutter is quite pertinent. Clutter is the physical manifestation of unmade decisions fuelled by procrastination. Even as I look around the desk where I type this I can see examples of that. Perhaps that's why it feels good once we do get around to clearing the clutter. At tidy home (or office) with less mess is appealing - but perhaps it's mental as well as visual. The satisfaction of completing the things we want to do is such a good feeling. So much better than staring at physical reminders of half-finished (or not yet started) actions.

Will robots take your job?

The future could be very different. It's one reason I started this blog. What will technology mean for jobs? For incomes? For society? So I was excited to find Will Robots Take Your Job? at my local library. What does the book say? There's always been technological change and we've always found jobs. As the more laborious jobs were taken by machines, we took on higher skilled jobs, moving further up the "skill ladder". The main question is whether this time is different. Will the "skill ladder" continue to have higher rungs for humans to move on to? Will these rungs appear as quickly as the current rungs disappear? Either way we're headed for significant disruption. Either large-scale re-training of our workforce or massive unemployment. The author despairs that our leaders seem not to talk about this - and worse still, not have a plan for it. Farmers or horses? In 1870 about 75% of Americans worked in agriculture and used 25 million hors