Skip to main content

The magic of compound growth

Compound Interest. Described by Albert Einstein as the 8th wonder of the world. Many people don't fully grasp its power and miss out on the magic.

Here's a quick example

For 30 days, would you rather (A) get $100 per day, or (B) get 1 cent doubled every day (ie. 2 cents on day two, 4 cents on day three, 8 cents on day four).

Quickly. What's your immediate answer?

On intuition, lots of people go for Option A. Why? Because $100 sounds so much more than 1 cent.

How do they compare?

Do the maths, and Option B wins by miles.

By Day 15, the 1 cent per day has grown to $163.84 per day.

Over the first 18 days, Option B accumulates $2621.43 (compared to $1800 for Option A). It just snowballs from there.

By the final days, Option B is getting millions per day and ends up with a total of $10.7 million. Meanwhile the total for Option A is just $3,000 ($100 x 30 days).

(Sidenote: Even if Option A was $100,000 per day, option B would still win.)

Life in slow motion

Investing can be much the same - just slower. Let's say for example that my retirement account averages 9% over the long term and I'm thinking of adding $10,000 to it this year.

At first I might think that $900 (9% of 10,000) isn't a huge amount. $900 per year for the next 30 years would be $27,000 extra in later life. That sounds reasonable, but is a big underestimate.

Because the $900 goes back into the investment, it also grows at 9% and so it snowballs.

Do the maths for a 30-year timespan, the $10,000 actually turns into a much bigger number...

$ 132,676.78 (to be precise)

Woah! That's not a 27k profit. That's a 122k profit.

If we only knew

Realising this maths can help us make better decisions.

If we think that investing $10,000 earns us just $900 per year (the dotted line below) we might be tempted to spend the ten thousand instead.

Once we realise that we can turn $10,000 into a six-figure sum (the solid curved line below) we might be more keen to invest.

So how does the maths work?

I get that a lot of people have maths-phobia from school. So let's break it down.

To work out what our money becomes in one year we multiply by one plus the rate of growth. For example, 9% growth would mean multiplying by 1.09.

eg. $10,000 x 1.09 = $10,900

For multiple years we keep multiplying by that rate.

eg. For two years, $10,000 x 1.09 x 1.09 = $11,881

Or if you're comfortable with exponential mathematics, put the rate to the power (or exponent) of the number of years.

eg. For 30 years, (1.09)30  x $10,000 = $132,676.78

(Remember to do the exponent part before multiplying by the amount - otherwise you'll get crazy numbers)

Notes

I haven't taken tax into account, because I was actually looking at the effect on my retirement savings and the 9% growth rate is after tax has already been subtracted.

Related Reading

$200k for a coffee and a sandwich

Get my monthly email for future money-maths items like this.

Disclaimer

This information is general in nature and does not take into account your personal situation. It is not financial advice. If you need specific advice on your circumstances or finances you should speak to an expert.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How much super will we have?

Will we be OK in old age? How much will we have? One of the great things about living in Australia is superannuation. Our employers are required to pay into an investment account for our retirement. In recent times, my wife and I have been in several conversations with friends who are wondering (or worried) if their balance will be enough. That's what inspired this article. Great question It's a great question to ask, especially around the age of 35 to 40. At that point, old age is less of a distant abstract concept. It's becoming a medium-term reality. At 35 the number of years of living off super is possibly more than half of your remaining years. At 40 you may consider yourself about half way through your working life. Looking at your balance, it's easy to think that twice that balance may not be enough.  Read on, because I have good news for you. It's better than you might think As I've mentioned in earlier posts, compound growth means the investment grows f

What is clutter anyway?

Today we're doing some cleaning up of the apartment, so this quote about clutter is quite pertinent. Clutter is the physical manifestation of unmade decisions fuelled by procrastination. Even as I look around the desk where I type this I can see examples of that. Perhaps that's why it feels good once we do get around to clearing the clutter. At tidy home (or office) with less mess is appealing - but perhaps it's mental as well as visual. The satisfaction of completing the things we want to do is such a good feeling. So much better than staring at physical reminders of half-finished (or not yet started) actions.

Will robots take your job?

The future could be very different. It's one reason I started this blog. What will technology mean for jobs? For incomes? For society? So I was excited to find Will Robots Take Your Job? at my local library. What does the book say? There's always been technological change and we've always found jobs. As the more laborious jobs were taken by machines, we took on higher skilled jobs, moving further up the "skill ladder". The main question is whether this time is different. Will the "skill ladder" continue to have higher rungs for humans to move on to? Will these rungs appear as quickly as the current rungs disappear? Either way we're headed for significant disruption. Either large-scale re-training of our workforce or massive unemployment. The author despairs that our leaders seem not to talk about this - and worse still, not have a plan for it. Farmers or horses? In 1870 about 75% of Americans worked in agriculture and used 25 million hors