How to boost your pension by 50%

People in the superannuation industry will say you need millions to retire. But it doesn't have to be that way.

The Barefoot method

If you've got millions in retirement good for you. But if not there's another way as outlined in book the Barefoot Investor. It's quite an effective strategy especially for those of who have had low income, variable income, or who are retiring early.

The idea is, by 67, to get your superannuation balance close to the maximum you can have before it starts reducing your pension.

Assuming you don't have other significant investments, at this point you can get the full age pension, plus some handy superannuation income. (Barefoot Investor also suggests some very-part-time work to boost it even more.)

How much are we talking?

Depending on your situation, you could get 50% more than the age pension.

For instance (as of June 2020) a single homeowner gets $22,375 age pension. At 67 a super balance of $225,000 would provide additional income of $11,250.

Likewise a couple who don't own a home get a $33,732 age pension. At 67 a super balance of $400,000 would provide additional income of $20,000.

As far as I understand it, all of this is tax-free (but I'm not a tax expert).

Edit

This is the part of the post where I previously had a calculator. The idea was that you could work out if this could be a possibility for you.

Realistically I'm not going to be able to update it each year as the government thresholds change, so I've removed the calculator.

Also, most people who tried it found out they would be way over the threshold. This should be great news (having lots of money in retirement). But some felt disappointment that they couldn't get the boost. Even though their retirement scenario would be far better than someone who could benefit.

For all these reasons, I've removed the calculator link. If you want to know more I recommend borrowing the Barefoot Investor book from the library.

Big disclaimer

This is a summary of something I read in the Barefoot Investor book, accompanied by some maths. It is not financial advice, and does not take into account your individual situation. Please evaluate you own circumstances and seek your own financial advice.

Comments

Adam ruins work

The TV show Adam Ruins Everything took a look at the workplace - and the 40 hour work week. It confirms my thoughts that the 40-hour work week (or at least it's relevance today) is a figment of our imagination. Very enlightening. Watch it now . The first 7 minutes are the most relevant. There were some astonishing stats coming out of it. For example, we spend only 45% of the work week doing our actual job (not including meetings etc). That's about 18 hours per week. Interestingly, that's what experts predicted. With rises in productivity, the 1950s brought talk of a 4-day work week. By 2030 they reckoned we might work just 15 hours per week. But instead we work longer hours. That results in more mistakes and safety mishaps. It also reduces brain function. We might think that it's being productive but Adam points to countries that have as much prosperity as America while working much shorter hours. A classic case of 'less is more'. PS. for the basis of ...

My mug shot

This is every mug I own. How many did I buy? Zero. They seem to just appear. I don't even drink tea or coffee. In winter I have might have a hot chocolate or cocoa. So 9 mugs seems like a lot. How does this happen? I reckon most mugs are gifts. There are two reasons for this. 1. It's a safe bet. People need to drink. It's kind of like buying your dad socks for father's day. But the difference is that socks wear out and need replacing. Cups don't. One of these mugs i received as a kid in the 90s. It still works fine. Now it has 8 friends. 2. It's often for what's on the mug. It might be a greeting card-style message, or a sports team logo, or something humorous. It's a good thing that something functional can also provide an inspiring message or pleasant memory as you use it. But the problem comes when we have too much. If I use the cup my sister gave me at Christmas, then I'm not using the 'awesome brother' one she already gave m...

Why millionaires don't "feel" rich

We're wealthier than ever - so why don't we feel like it? Australia has gone almost three decades without recession. The stock market recently hit a record high. Our wages are record highs. Home loan rates are at record lows. We live in one of the richest countries in the world at the richest point in history. So what's wrong? Comparison Wealth is relative. So what do we compare to? Where we expect to be? "When your wages growth is only 2 or 3 per cent, you don't feel as well-off as when it's going up 10 per cent. That's that nominal distortion that people often suffer from" , says economist Shane Oliver, and that "expectations have grown a lot faster than reality." We're earning more than last year, but we want even more. So compared to our imaginary situation, we see ourselves as worse off. What we see around us? Shane Oliver again. "If you think about it - Australians today are a lot wealthier. They're living far ric...

But wait... there's less!

Search This Blog