Skip to main content

Is private school the best option?

It's back-to-school time here in Australia. If it's a private school, it's time to pay school fees.

An investment

Some schools describe their fees as "an investment" in the child's future. If it's an investment, let's compare it to other investments. What else could we provide for our kids for the same cost?


Other options

Scott Pape recommends investments bonds for investing on behalf of children. As they grow up, there's a range of funds to invest in shares. Or they can put it in their own superannuation (retirement) account, so we know they'll be OK even after we're gone.

Investment rate

My superannuation account returns 10.2% over the long term - and that's after fees and taxes. But that's probably better than most.

To be really conservative I'm going to assume a much lower 8%, as taxes are generally higher outside of superannuation. Bear in mind these are not exact calculations - we're just trying to get some ball-park figures.

School 1 - Relatively affordable

A relative of mine attends a fairly affordable local Christian school. The total tuition fees, up to year 9, come to $27,975.

If each year the parents invested the same amount as that year's fee, the kid could have $133,000 at age 30, or $287,000 at age 40.

What if we invest for retirement?

If at age 16 years, we give the kid an amount equal to their total school fees - in this case $27,975. Invested in the kid's superannuation, 50 years later it could be $1.33 million.

No matter how many times I check my maths, I am astounded by how much that is. But it shouldn't be such a surprise. Time is a powerful asset in the investing world, and kids have more of that than anyone.

School 2 - Middle range

OK, but what about a typical private school? My friend sends her kids to a primary school (P-6) that charges $7472 per year for a total cost of $52,304 - for primary school only.

The same calculations as before now give results of:
At 30: $287,000
At 40: $621,000
At retirement: $2.45 million

That's just for primary school. Even if we assume high school is the same price (normally it's higher) then 13 years of schooling costs $97,136. Again, investing these fees could give the following amounts:

At 30: $437,000
At 40: $943,000
At retirement: $4.55 million

This is where I start to wonder which is better for a kid; private schooling or nearly a million dollars at age 40. But let's continue.

School 3 - High end

A "prestigious" private school near me charges $18,182 for prep, climbing up to $24,116 for year 12. This is where the numbers get really eye-watering. The total bill is $281,654. Ouch!

Again, investing that money could have really big outcomes.
At 30: $1.23 million
At 40: $2.65 million
At retirement: $13.2 million

What should a parent do?

Some of those numbers are absolutely staggering.

Obviously we want our kids to have a great education. It can help set them up for a great future. As could the ability to buy a property outright at age 30. As could having the money to start their own business. Or a nest egg to support them while raising their own children. Or having retirement fully taken care of. Or being able to retire at a time of their choosing.

It's hard to know what would benefit our kids more - private schooling, or a six or seven-figure sum of money.

It's not either/or

It doesn't have to be one or the other. Some parents can do both, but that can be really expensive.

Perhaps a more affordable school allows us to invest partially in education and partially in other ways that could really help our kids later on.

Big disclaimer

Obviously this is not intended as financial advice or even parental advice. I'm just running some hypothetical numbers to give an indication what else could be achieved with the kind of money we spend on school fees.

Obviously returns can vary from year-to-year and from investment-to-investment. Please take this into consideration. The numbers quoted are based on the assumptions I outlined and could vary significantly. I also haven't taken inflation into account. These are intended as ball-park figures to illustrate the scale of what's possible, with this kind of money and the time available to young people.

PS. If you'd be interested in your own calculator where you can enter your own figures, let me know in the comments. If there's some interest, I'll put one online. You can also get my monthly-ish email updates, so you'll know when it's available.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How much super will we have?

Will we be OK in old age? How much will we have? One of the great things about living in Australia is superannuation. Our employers are required to pay into an investment account for our retirement. In recent times, my wife and I have been in several conversations with friends who are wondering (or worried) if their balance will be enough. That's what inspired this article. Great question It's a great question to ask, especially around the age of 35 to 40. At that point, old age is less of a distant abstract concept. It's becoming a medium-term reality. At 35 the number of years of living off super is possibly more than half of your remaining years. At 40 you may consider yourself about half way through your working life. Looking at your balance, it's easy to think that twice that balance may not be enough.  Read on, because I have good news for you. It's better than you might think As I've mentioned in earlier posts, compound growth means the investment grows f

Will robots take your job?

The future could be very different. It's one reason I started this blog. What will technology mean for jobs? For incomes? For society? So I was excited to find Will Robots Take Your Job? at my local library. What does the book say? There's always been technological change and we've always found jobs. As the more laborious jobs were taken by machines, we took on higher skilled jobs, moving further up the "skill ladder". The main question is whether this time is different. Will the "skill ladder" continue to have higher rungs for humans to move on to? Will these rungs appear as quickly as the current rungs disappear? Either way we're headed for significant disruption. Either large-scale re-training of our workforce or massive unemployment. The author despairs that our leaders seem not to talk about this - and worse still, not have a plan for it. Farmers or horses? In 1870 about 75% of Americans worked in agriculture and used 25 million hors

Shop less. Live more.

October is Buy Nothing New Month , and that's their slogan: Shop Less. Live More. This quote about consumption is doubly true. There's the hours we spend to earn the money to spend. Then there's the hours bustling around shopping centres and malls searching out the thing we want (or that advertising has told us we want). Of course there's also the issue of where we put all this stuff we buy. Do we just buy a bigger house (with a bigger mortgage) or do we put it in storage? "The Japanese may have tidiness but in America we have storage lockers - our only growth industry." - Marge Simpson . I found these stats about the US storage industry . I find it such a waste that after spending so much to buy all this stuff we then spend another $22 billion to store it. Shocking. Clearly we need to be less addicted to purchasing. Buy Nothing New Month is a great way to start. Are you with me?