Is it really worth it?

One of the secrets to this lifestyle is determining whether things provide value for their cost.

Weighing up the cost

Cost is not just money. It's the hassle of buying it, the space to store it, the time to clean and maintain it and, for the eco-conscious, the impact of disposing of it later. Is it worth all that cost for the benefit it brings?

What ads say

The trick is that society (particularly advertising) will tell you the opposite. Provided you have the money - and often even if you don't - something that brings any value at all is something we are urged to buy.

Sometimes it's even just the slim chance of a tiny amount of value. This current ad is a classic example. Telstra, an Australian telco, is known for its comprehensive area coverage, particularly in remote areas.

The proposition seems to be that you should pay for this extra coverage incase:

You are a footy fan, AND
you're in a remote area on game night, AND
the power goes out during the game, AND
no-one else at the venue has Telstra (despite it being Australia's most popular telco), AND
the game must absolutely be watched live, AND
your phone has sufficient charge to last the rest of the game.

Highly unlikely

That's a very unlikely sequence of events. Even as someone who watches a fair amount of sport, I'm very confident I'll go the rest of my life without it ever happening.

Not a big deal

Even as a sports fan, there are far worse things in life than missing half a TV game. Ads like this are really just exploiting our FOMO.

A better alternative

Recently I've been reading Digital Minimalism* by Cal Newport. I imagine he'd suggest that instead of going to extreme lengths to feed our addiction to more screen time, that the fans (when the power goes out) could gather around and share stories about their love of the game and their favourite football memories.

The social interaction would be far more meaningful than everyone staring at one mobile screen for an hour - and half of the people being upset about their team losing.

*Soon I'll be publishing my review of Digital Minimalism (it's great read). Follow on facebook, or subscribe at the top of the screen to be notified when I've written it.

Comments

5 Reasons why we hoard - and they're wrong

"Less is More" is one of the catch-cries of downsizing. Often the fewer things we have the more we value them. So it's a great title for a book that's basically a manual for how to de-clutter your home. The introductory chapter of Less is More: How to De-clutter Your Life gives some great insights into why we find it so hard to reduce our stuff. Here are 5 of them - the last one is one of the biggest for me. 1. The cost of holding on. We were raised by our parents and grandparents and in their day items were expensive and space was cheap. It made sense in those days to hold onto stuff just in case you ever needed it. But today housing is expensive and items are cheap. It's hard to change a habit, but now we save much more by downsizing. 2. Keeping it in the family. For some reason we prefer to give things to those close to us. Again this was viable in the days of big families and lots of children to receive hand-me-downs. But these days we have smaller fa...

20 unplugged ideas

May 1-7 is Screen-Free Week . It's about spending time away from the screen and more time with each other - or doing things we love. It's a great chance to break the work-tired-watchTV-ads-shop-work cycle. This list of twenty alternative ideas is great for screen-free week. It's also a great reminder of things we could enjoy if we're shopping and spending less - and maybe working less and enjoying life more.

How much super will we have?

Will we be OK in old age? How much will we have? One of the great things about living in Australia is superannuation. Our employers are required to pay into an investment account for our retirement. In recent times, my wife and I have been in several conversations with friends who are wondering (or worried) if their balance will be enough. That's what inspired this article. Great question It's a great question to ask, especially around the age of 35 to 40. At that point, old age is less of a distant abstract concept. It's becoming a medium-term reality. At 35 the number of years of living off super is possibly more than half of your remaining years. At 40 you may consider yourself about half way through your working life. Looking at your balance, it's easy to think that twice that balance may not be enough. Read on, because I have good news for you. It's better than you might think As I've mentioned in earlier posts, compound growth means the investment grows f...

But wait... there's less!

Search This Blog