Skip to main content

Will robots take your job?

The future could be very different. It's one reason I started this blog. What will technology mean for jobs? For incomes? For society?

So I was excited to find Will Robots Take Your Job? at my local library.


What does the book say?

There's always been technological change and we've always found jobs. As the more laborious jobs were taken by machines, we took on higher skilled jobs, moving further up the "skill ladder".

The main question is whether this time is different. Will the "skill ladder" continue to have higher rungs for humans to move on to? Will these rungs appear as quickly as the current rungs disappear?

Either way we're headed for significant disruption. Either large-scale re-training of our workforce or massive unemployment. The author despairs that our leaders seem not to talk about this - and worse still, not have a plan for it.

Farmers or horses?

In 1870 about 75% of Americans worked in agriculture and used 25 million horses to do so. Farming technology developed. Now just 1% of Americans are farmers and the horses are gone.

Using this analogy for the current age, will we be the farmers (and find other work) or the horses (and be no longer required).

So what will happen?

The book examines some areas where technology is poised to take over - including transport, legal, financial and education sectors. Unlike the 'rust-belt' collapse in places like Detroit, this disruption will be spread across industries and geography.

The change may also be quick. Think of how far we've come in recent decades. In the 90s we didn't have internet. In the 2000s, in-car navigation was a thick book of maps. In 2010 we still had video rental stores. Change in technology happens quicker and quicker. So it makes sense that the next 20 years will bring even more change.

Various reports estimate the percentage of jobs affected to be at least 9% and up to 47%. For comparison, unemployment in the Great Depression was 25%.

What will we do?

"New human experience and capabilities emerge" that are previously unimaginable. Who would have imagined decades ago that we'd now have people who work in SEO, ebay sellers, Airbnb hosts, or professional bloggers? It's hard to imagine the future whether it be the future jobs that will exist or a "social order in which many more people don't work for a living".

The culture shock of the future can be compared to visiting a foreign country - except there's no return flight. We should get ready to live there - and to embrace the differences and advantages that it holds.

It might not be so bad

There are two ways the author sees the disruption being less than expected.
1. As consumers we might pay more for human interaction.
2. There might be many and varied new jobs and enough education and re-training.
Even then, there's still disruption, it's just a question of how big and how long.

What should we do

The main theme of this book is to be prepared. In a world where there are fewer working hours to go around the author suggests these ways to be prepared:
  • Prepare people by talking about this more (especially by leaders)
  • Create policies to share work around more evenly.
  • Perhaps introduce a robot tax to replace lost income tax.
  • Look at Universal Basic income to take care of people when jobs are scarce. (The author notes that UBI is not the only way to do this but looks more attractive as scenarios get more dramatic.)
  • Prepare our workforce, noting that the important skills of the future will be the essentially human qualities such as relational abilities, intuition, creativity and emotional intelligence.

What are humans for?

Let's sum up with two quotes from the book. First, that people continually "note the overwhelming complexity of certain tasks that humans do, and conclude that computers won't be able to master them, yet it's only a matter of time before they do". Early examples include playing chess. More recently driving a car.

The second quote is suggested to be the central question of 2025:
What are people for in a world that does not need their labor, and where only a minority are needed to guide the 'bot-based economy?
That's a fascinating question to ponder. When life is not about work, what is our purpose as human beings?

PS. If you're interested in this topic, check out my related post Humans Need Not Apply or the article You will lose your job.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to retire on a boat at 40

Irish Leonard explains how his family of four lives on a sailboat. No inheritance. No lottery. Just not wasting money - or his time. How does he afford it? He explains by showing the average Irish household expenses, converted into hours worked. Here's the result shown as a working week: We work a lot to pay for our cars. As he puts it: Almost 20% of our working lives is spent so that we can afford to get to our working lives. So Leonard eliminates or massively reduces most expenses. On the family boat, he sails "in a climate that requires no heating or air conditioning, doesn't own a car and generates what energy he needs using solar panels". Remove the unnecessary costs and you remove most of the need to work. He calculates that we can feed and clothe our family on 5 days work per month, or the equivalent. By contrast the average Irish couple devotes 19 hours a day to work, including commuting. Why all this focus on time? In Leonard's words "I...

Big motivator for small living

It's been a while between posts here - mainly because we've been moving house. It's been a real motivator for downsizing. Packing each and every item we owned, really makes me wish there were fewer of them. Moving everything from the old apartment to the new one made me envious of those people who live in a "tiny house on wheels". For them moving house simply means towing it to a new location. No packing required. The whole process has reaffirmed our commitment to owning less stuff. So we're going to be intentional about downsizing. It will be an ongoing activity. My environmental heart couldn't stomach a spontaneous dumping of things into the garbage, but it's also more fun this way. Selling things online brings in some handy pocket money. Giving items away is also a great community activity, whether it is to friends and family, to charity or to people in the neighbourhood. I'm looking forward to it as a lifestyle rather than a task to do....

The joy of selling - 3 ways it's great

My friend Stephen asked about charging for things. He felt bad about charging someone $30 for an artwork - even if it cost him much more. Should he feel bad? No. If someone wants to pay the price, they obviously value it highly (at least more than the $30). If he's willing to sell, he must value it less than $30. So it's going to the person who will get more joy out of it. Why not just give it to them for free? Money is a convenient way to measure value. It's also a way to share the joy. If Steve gives the art away then he no longer gets to enjoy it - so is worse off. By selling it for $30, he is happier with the $30, and the buyer is happier with the artwork. The end result of the sale is that both people are happier than they were before. Here are 3 reasons it's better to sell than to giveaway and how it helps you declutter and minimise better. 1. Money (most obviously). It might just be a few bucks here and there - but it adds up. My wife and I often sell an i...