Monopoly, money and you

One of the most well-known board games can also be a great way to learn about money and investing - according to this book.

Perhaps one way to teach kids (and maybe ourselves) about finance is to play a board game. In so many ways, the game parallels our own financial life - and we can practice financial decision-making without losing any real money.

Is monopoly like life?

Yes and no. We manage our cash, negotiate, make deals, make choices, go through tough times, make investments, pay tax and reap rewards.

To do well we have to make investments. It's very hard to win just by collecting $200 each time you pass go.

There are rules, and wise moves. The better we know them, the better we do.

However, in real life, you can win without forcing others into bankruptcy.

Principles that work in the game and life

Diversify. You might have hotels on the two most expensive properties on the board, but if no-one lands on them, you still might lose.

Investments have a price and a value. They are not necessarily the same. Understanding value helps you determine whether the price is too high or a bargain.

Finding the ideal amount of cash. Holding on to too much cash means missing out on investment returns. Not holding enough means getting hit hard by expenses and missing out on new investment opportunities.

It's a mix of luck and skill. If you're a winner, other players may think it was luck, but a large amount of the success comes from wise decision-making, maximising your chances, and being in a position to benefit from any luck that comes your way.

The game has phases. In Monopoly, it's buy, build and bankrupt. In life, it's accumulate, grow and withdraw.

Wealthy people are wealthy because their money is working for them - rather than them working for money.

In summary

This is a fascinating book if you've played (or play) Monopoly. There are a lot of tips purely on how to play better at Monopoly - so if you've never played, then that could be a bit tedious. Also the author refers to the properties on the American board, so if you're not familiar with that board, then it loses some meaning.

The intelligent approach to the game, and the connection to real life finances is quite interesting.

It's also got me interested in playing the game, for the first time in a long time.

Comments

5 Reasons why we hoard - and they're wrong

"Less is More" is one of the catch-cries of downsizing. Often the fewer things we have the more we value them. So it's a great title for a book that's basically a manual for how to de-clutter your home. The introductory chapter of Less is More: How to De-clutter Your Life gives some great insights into why we find it so hard to reduce our stuff. Here are 5 of them - the last one is one of the biggest for me. 1. The cost of holding on. We were raised by our parents and grandparents and in their day items were expensive and space was cheap. It made sense in those days to hold onto stuff just in case you ever needed it. But today housing is expensive and items are cheap. It's hard to change a habit, but now we save much more by downsizing. 2. Keeping it in the family. For some reason we prefer to give things to those close to us. Again this was viable in the days of big families and lots of children to receive hand-me-downs. But these days we have smaller fa...

20 unplugged ideas

May 1-7 is Screen-Free Week . It's about spending time away from the screen and more time with each other - or doing things we love. It's a great chance to break the work-tired-watchTV-ads-shop-work cycle. This list of twenty alternative ideas is great for screen-free week. It's also a great reminder of things we could enjoy if we're shopping and spending less - and maybe working less and enjoying life more.

Will robots take your job?

The future could be very different. It's one reason I started this blog. What will technology mean for jobs? For incomes? For society? So I was excited to find Will Robots Take Your Job? at my local library. What does the book say? There's always been technological change and we've always found jobs. As the more laborious jobs were taken by machines, we took on higher skilled jobs, moving further up the "skill ladder". The main question is whether this time is different. Will the "skill ladder" continue to have higher rungs for humans to move on to? Will these rungs appear as quickly as the current rungs disappear? Either way we're headed for significant disruption. Either large-scale re-training of our workforce or massive unemployment. The author despairs that our leaders seem not to talk about this - and worse still, not have a plan for it. Farmers or horses? In 1870 about 75% of Americans worked in agriculture and used 25 million hors...

But wait... there's less!

Search This Blog