Skip to main content

Everything That Remains (book review)

A memoir is normally someone's life story. For Joshua Millburn it's just 5 years. But a lot happens in that short time.

Joshua and his best friend Ryan became "The Minimalists". They also made a documentary, which I asked my local library to stock. "In the meantime," said my helpful librarian, "would you be interested in a book they have written?".

The book is written by Joshua with short notes inserted by Ryan - an entertaining way to have co-authors. It feels like you're sitting in the living room with Josh telling you a story. In the adjacent kitchen, ostensibly doing something else, Ryan is close enough to throw in the occasional interjection - sometimes profound and sometimes just poking fun of Josh.

Two women

In a short space of time Joshua loses both his mother and his wife. In different ways the two events bring him face-to-face with the way we accumulate stuff to make us happy (which it doesn't) and the degree to which we often neglect people in the pursuit of working for money to buy that stuff.

Firing himself

Josh was spending all of his 6-figure income (and more) to seek happiness - but not finding it. After discovering minimalism, in his own unique and interesting way, he realised that working 10-12 hours a day, often 6 days a week, just wasn't worth it. When instructed to plan the company's next round of downsizing Joshua puts his own name at the top of the redundancy list.

Best buddy

Around this time, best friend Ryan notices positive changes in Josh. Ryan's questions give Josh the chance to explain his new mindset to Ryan - and to readers. The book tells how each of them downsized.

Josh, with the advantage of a headstart began with the idea of eliminating one item per day - but ended up doing much more than that.

His friend Ryan chose the quicker method of packing everything he owned, as if moving house. He didn't move house, but instead unpacked items as he needed them. Anything that was still packed at the end of 21 days was deemed unnecessary.

"Decluttering"

This word can mean different things to different people. Josh is not a fan of some TV segments on how to declutter - when it's mostly just re-shuffling many items into neater arrangements.

In that sense of the word he figures it's the same as hoarding - just better organised. Behind all the shuffling we are still clinging tightly to physical items that not only bring us no joy, but often prevent us from finding any.

Experiments

The second half of the book is more about Joshua's life (and Ryan's) after discovering minimalism. Joshua conducts "experiments" on himself to find what is useful in life and what is just clutter. These include not having a TV, going a month without a phone and not having internet at home. It's not just about physical clutter but what clutters up his life, his time and his mind.

What do you do?

This question should not exist - outside of maybe an industry networking event. I've always detested it and was pleased to find a kindred spirit in Joshua. It really is just about finding what someone does for money, an indication of how much they earn and therefore their social status.

Joshua has a fantastic alternative which I'll be using from now on. "What are you passionate about?". He also explains the key difference between excitement and passion.

What's it all about

In the second last chapter Josh sums up his experience:

"At twenty-eight ... I was forced to look around at all the stuff surrounding me. It was everywhere. My house was full of things I'd purchased in an attempt to find happiness."

After changing his mindset, and his actions, his experience is much different:

"Ultimately I discovered that I truly needed far less than I thought I did. For the first time in my life, I could see happiness getting closer as I walked away from the stuff I thought would make me happy and towards real happiness."

Is this book for you?

If you're thinking you have too much stuff, and you'd be better off with less, you should read this book.

If that's not you but you like a well-told story of a major change in someone's life, this may also be right up your alley.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to waste a year's wages

A friend recently asked me why it is that so many people (on good incomes) are struggling to save. Often the big three money areas are housing, transport and food. In one sense these are necessary items. But what we spend on them is often way more than necessary. I crunched some numbers on how much extra my wife and I could spend on these things - if for some reason we wanted to burn our money. 1. Housing Our apartment is fairly nice, but also cost-effective. I've mentioned how choosing it saves us $1,800 per year , compared to a similar one we saw. The high end of 2-bedroom apartments in our suburb is $305 per week more than our apartment. Not $305 per week. $305 per week more than ours is. I cannot get over that. Sure it's new and modern-looking, but that's a lot of money. It's an extra $15,860 per year above what we pay. 2. Transport The Australian Automobile Association lists the costs of owning and running a car. It includes many often-overlooked c

Don't dump on charities

Netflix causes mass dumping. Here's an alternative. January is usually a big month for physical donations to charity. In 2019 it's been over-the-top (literally) as charity donation bins have been overflowing with items. The Netflix series "Tidying Up" by famous declutterer Marie Kondo (see her book ) has inspired many to declutter their homes. But in the process they've cluttered the streets. What's so bad about donating? When the bins overflow the extra items are thrown away. Having been in the weather, the rain and on the ground, they are classified as contaminated and cannot be sold. To make it worse, much of what fills the bins is not good enough to sell, and is also dumped. Bad donations hurt charities 13 million dollars. That's how much it costs charities to deal with all the junk we dump on them - 60,000 tonnes a year. Lifeline says half its stores have stopped accepting donations. We might think we're helping, but that's a lot

This could all be yours

This cartoon kind of happened to me on the weekend. Joking about death My dad has his own unique sense of humour. Flippantly he joked that when he passes away, the first thing I'll need to do is get a rubbish skip (maybe two) and jam it full with all the junk from the garage. I was reminded of Marie Kondo, who says in her book that we have to deal with items either now or later; so it might as well be now. For people who have retired, I guess there's a third option: Ignore it for a few more decades and let descendants deal with it. Don't get me wrong - my dad has plenty of years left yet. But from his joke I'm guessing he's reasonably happy to let it all sit there while he enjoys retired life. Why not deal with it? I can kind of understand. It's an overwhelming task (even to look at). There's also the "I might need that" factor. Which is fair enough, but even if an item is needed, is it findable in amongst everything else? About half the